- Messages
- 33,772
- Reaction score
- 31,539
AdamJT13;1909877 said:Nobody knows yet.
bingo......
AdamJT13;1909877 said:Nobody knows yet.
Sarge;1909948 said:bingo......
Fred Taylor isn't a full-time back though. He's the starter sure, but he still has a tag-team duo back relationship with Maurice Jones-Drew-Olivia-Newton-John. Taylor had 223 carries this season. When I think of "THE" back, I think of LT who had 315. Sure MBIII can be the starter, but it's pretty obvious he's gonna need someone like JJ to carry the load. I understand that the NFL is heavily turning toward tandem backs, but that's the point, MBIII can be a great side to a duo, just not THE back.abersonc;1909932 said:actually it is a very good example because I think too few people on this board understand how many carries is "full time" now
Portis led the league in attempts - with just over 20 a game.
Taylor was 17th in the league -- right in the middle of starting backs - that's a good average to look at for what a starting RB's load is
Alexander;1909929 said:Very few backs are "fulltime" anymore.
Those that are, don't last long. Take a good look at Larry Johnson if you have questions.
Barber will be an excellent starter. We just need another speed back that complements him. Hopefully we can get one that doesn't have all kinds of personality issues or a propensity to run like a robot like our last one.
Big Dakota;1910008 said:MBIII had 204 carries in the reg. season. That's 17 per game. In todays NFL that is MORE than enough. I wouldn't run MBIII more than 225 times in any one season. JJ had 164 carries or about 14 per game. All we need is a JJ replacement. He doesn't need to be a "full time back". Why do people get caught up in labels? Want a label? MBIII is a HELL OF A PLAYER. How's that for a label?
Big Dakota;1910008 said:MBIII had 204 carries in the reg. season. That's 17 per game. In todays NFL that is MORE than enough. I wouldn't run MBIII more than 225 times in any one season. JJ had 164 carries or about 14 per game. All we need is a JJ replacement. He doesn't need to be a "full time back". Why do people get caught up in labels? Want a label? MBIII is a HELL OF A PLAYER. How's that for a label?
Cajuncowboy;1909873 said:Don't get me wrong, I like what he does and the guy truly is a beast. But after re watching the game he seemed to be a bit wore down in the second half.
I guess my question is can he carry the monster share of the carries and be effective late in the games or was this something of an anomaly?
CowboyJeff;1910116 said:so you're saying Parcells was right??
Cajuncowboy;1910123 said:I'm saying I'm not sure. I don't know if he can handle a full load or if this game was not a typical example of what he can do. He was red hot in the first half and ice cold in the second half. I just wonder if it was adjustments the Giants made that we didn't react to or if he just wears down because of how hard he runs.
Big Dakota;1910129 said:IMHO the OL was to blame. They didn't open holes for the run, nor did they block for Tony in the second half. Maybe 3 weeks off hurt the big fellas?