Alohawg1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,347
- Reaction score
- 4,069
I was told anyone can run behind this offensive line.
This offensive line needs all it's pieces.
I was told anyone can run behind this offensive line.
This offensive line needs all it's pieces.
I watched the All-22 today and L. Collins was pretty bad at run blocking. He missed blocks, block the wrong guy and gave running backs no chance.
When we had a TE on his side, we were able to run better. I don't know if it was him making the wrong read or bad coaching but he was not very good when it came to run blocking.
It's hard to evaluate how good/bad the RBs were when the run blocking was so bad.
What did you all see in his 3 carries that makes you think he is strictly a 3rd stringer. No RB can be successful without some blocking. How many yards did Zek gain with no blocking vs Denver? I like Smith’s running style and think he can be successful with some decent blocking.With zeke out with suspension, we got to see Alfred, Rod, and DMC play. After watching that game, I really believe that R . smith is strictly a third stringer.
So What you’re saying is the OL plays better with Zeke behind our line and that there is a big difference between our #1 back and his supplements.
I looked at his 4 year career totals, but pretty much all the previous posts also summarize itWhat did you all see in his 3 carries that makes you think he is strictly a 3rd stringer. No RB can be successful without some blocking. How many yards did Zek gain with no blocking vs Denver? I like Smith’s running style and think he can be successful with some decent blocking.
In your post you said, “ after watching the game I think he is really a 3rd stringer”. If you are basing your decision off his career rushing totals understandable, though I disagree. From watching R. Smith in the preseason I think he can be successful with some blocking. Hopefully Sunday night he’ll get a chance to prove himself.I looked at his 4 year career totals.
McFadden has good hands coming out of the backfield. Give Smith some more carries he seems limited to me. The OL needs to be at their best also the line was very average against the Falcons.I think they should be playing McFadden or Smith and incorporate them into the passing game. Just don't run them straight into the back of the OL or the teeth of the defense. Lol.
I did...I've been watching him and understand he's a pet cat to some like Darius Jackson last year. Then I got curious and checked out his yardage stats and special teams tackle stats after some claimed he was a ST ace. So I actually did a little studying on him.In your post you said, “ after watching the game I think he is really a 3rd stringer”. If you are basing your decision off his career rushing totals understandable, though I disagree. From watching R. Smith in the preseason I think he can be successful with some blocking. Hopefully Sunday night he’ll get a chance to prove himself.
Bad news considering the Eagles run defense.We don't run the ball, we'll lose.
I did...I've been watching him and understand he's a pet cat to some like Darius Jackson last year. Then I got curious and checked out his yardage stats and special teams tackle stats after some claimed he was a ST ace. So I actually did a little studying on him.
Hey it's ok if you like him. To each their own. But If im a betting man, I'd bet that he's not a feature back- hence my thread topic "is rod smith the answer". To me the answer is no. Backup. Yeah
Rod Smith isnt anything more then a glorified ST player and would be a damn good FBWith zeke out with suspension, we got to see Alfred, Rod, and DMC play. After watching that game, I really believe that R . smith is strictly a third stringer.
I was told anyone can run behind this offensive line.