Ok fine, then we'll go by fame. Tebow and Kaepernick are about as famous as it gets. A bunch of OL are in who certainly weren't famous. "fame" means nothing.
Nice try taking my statement out of context. Let's go back to what I originally said:
tyke1doe said:
Yes, you can. His Super Bowl rings, and his play leading up to and in the Super Bowl. It's the Hall of FAME not the Hall of Stats.
If you have contributed stats AND have contributed significant moments to the game, especially at the highest level, the voters will select you.
The Hall of Fame considers a player's impact on the game, both stats and fame as far as contributing significant moments to the game, particularly on the largest stage. Tebow doesn't have the stats. Neither does Kaepernick.
All arguments are 100%. Eli is the one who goes against the trend, because he is the one who was a bad player. Those guys were all, easily, in the top-3 of their era. Eli was never even top 10.
You must not understand what I mean by all arguments are not 100 percent. What I mean is not every situation fits every argument. That's where the concept "the exception to the rule" comes from. A rule establishes a particular pattern. But you can generally find exceptions to the pattern.
Second, Eli is in the top 10 in the history of the game in terms of passing yardage. Maybe you weren't paying attention. And he has two Super Bowl rings, making a significant play to upset the 18-0 New England Patriots.
His stats and his fame and his name will get him in the Hall of Fame.
I know. And I'm saying that sportswriters get it wrong time and time again.
And you get it right? It doesn't matter what you think. The process has anointed the sportswriters to select the Hall of Fame inductees, and what they say goes.