Let's bring some realism to this homer party.
Romo's has beaten only 1 team over .500 this year. In the one game he won against a team over .500. he threw 2 interceptions, a fumble, and managed to manufacture 1 score from a drive, and that was against Philly. So why should I be optimistic against a perennial failure when all he beats are sorry to mediocre teams? His defense saved him in the Philly game, that defense played like the 85 bears. NY Giants offense outscores ours, but thanks to J Heath who scored a TD, we outscore the Giants.
Let's bring some "realism" to this hater's post.
First off, if you're going to bag the guy for his two interceptions against the Eagles, then at least bring up WHY those balls got intercepted. I mean, that is if you're really trying to be a "realist" here. And I'll give you a hint, it had nothing to do with bad throws by Romo. The first one got intercepted because Dez Bryant couldn't catch a last second hail mary at the half. Romo threw a perfect 50 yard bomb that went right through his hands, and of course he didn't catch it but the defender did.
On the second interception, Tanner decided he was going to run the wrong route and lead a defender into the path of a throw. Beasely was wide open if it weren't for Tanner being clueless, but no, let's put that on Romo since he takes blame for everything anyway. Romo actually played a good game, if it weren't for two mistakes he had no control over, he would've finished the day with 30/47, 370 YDS, 2 TDS, 0 INTS. And you wouldn't be spewing nonsense about that game.
As for the Giants game, Romo played a damn good football game. You obviously didn't watch this game, because if you did there's no way in hell you'd be complaining about Romo here. And no, our offense wouldn't of gotten outscored, especially not due to Romo's play. We would've scored a TD on that last drive if it was needed, but it wasn't and we kicked the FG. If you're going to be a realist, you should bring up these things ... A "realist" SHOULD see both sides, but it's apparent you can't.
Also, It's tough to put drive's together when your star WR is causing interceptions, dropping balls, and fumbling the ball 20 yards backwards. Ohh, and lets not forget Romo put together a game winning drive in harsh weather conditions, on the road, and against a divisional rival in a critical game. If you want to blame someone for this game, try looking at the guy who wears the #88 jersey, not the guy who orchestrated the GWD.
And we beat a last place in their division sorry raider team on the backs of, NOT Romo, but the running backs of all things. So beating sub .500 teams don't impress me.
Don't be fooled, if Romo needed to win the game for us against a "sorry raider team", he easily would have. Romo was 12 of 12 for 100 yards and TD in the second half, he was hot red, but we didn't need him because our RB's were actually having a good game. You would've seen this if you actually watched the game ...
If Romo actually takes us to an NFC championship game, I will start looking at him differently. If he takes us to a Super Bowl, I may get on board. If he wins one, I will be buy his Jersey and proclaim him great.
The only way we make a run in the playoffs is if this defense steps up and actually plays ... defense. It won't be because of Romo balling out, because we still lose games when Romo plays flawlessly.
I don't want to hear **** about the team needs to perform because this thread isn't about the team, it's about just Romo. So obviously the only time you guys mention it is when someone like me asked for championships, then the team term comes out.
And I don't want to hear **** about how Romo needs to perform better when we're ranked 6th in offensive passer rating, yet we're ranked 22nd in defensive passer rating. You're asking a lot from your QB if you're asking him to be any better, how about asking the defense to be something other then straight garbage? They don't even have to be good, if they're average then this team will make the playoffs easily.
Also, next time you declare that you're going to bring some "realism", actually bring it. I don't know what the heck you brought, but it definitely wasn't "realism". Pffft.