Is TO High Maintenance?

YoMick;1644094 said:
Al Michael's knows this how?

He probably qualified it with a "looks like."

Even then its speculative to blame WR vs QB.

Then again, that speculation was the basis for this thread because it seemed like the times WR & QB were on different pages it was always TO.

But I'm done with that now. Lets see what this week brings. ;)
 
No offense to this thread starter-but it amazes me how many cockamania threads this MB goes through every day. First, we're throwing Romo under a bus just for that ONE pick(if anything, it was a big credit to the Gints' D), then we're throwing D-Ware under a bus for being "over-rated" after ONE mediocre game, and now this, even though there's NOTHING to base on?
 
TunaFan33;1644115 said:
No offense to this thread starter-but it amazes me how many cockamania threads this MB goes through every day. First, we're throwing Romo under a bus just for that ONE pick(if anything, it was a big credit to the Gints' D), then we're throwing D-Ware under a bus for being "over-rated" after ONE mediocre game, and now this, even though there's NOTHING to base on?

No one got thrown under the bus in this thread. I simply asked a question based on what I observed in rewatching the game - the question was indeed based on something. I understand your opinion is there is nothing to it. Noted.

And I suspect the word you wanted was cockamamie.

I'm afraid to look up the meaning of what you typed. :eek: ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,928
Messages
13,905,800
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top