waldoputty
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,375
- Reaction score
- 21,163
Of course, we should have an all-pro in every position.
But if we go towards a RPO offense instead of a traditional triplet offense, does it reduce the importance of a WR1.
Or rather, is it more important to have at least 3 WR2 than a WR1?
The RPO, with a dominant OL and a dominant RB, can disrupt a defense possibly more than WR1 can?
That would be by misdirection, having multiple options from each formation, ...
Rolling out in one direction and leaving a DE uncovered to gain a one-man advantage
IMO, we could deemphasize the WR1 and use the draft pick/$ for WR1 towards OL and defense.
But if we go towards a RPO offense instead of a traditional triplet offense, does it reduce the importance of a WR1.
Or rather, is it more important to have at least 3 WR2 than a WR1?
The RPO, with a dominant OL and a dominant RB, can disrupt a defense possibly more than WR1 can?
That would be by misdirection, having multiple options from each formation, ...
Rolling out in one direction and leaving a DE uncovered to gain a one-man advantage
IMO, we could deemphasize the WR1 and use the draft pick/$ for WR1 towards OL and defense.