CowboyChris
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,491
- Reaction score
- 4,932
you would think the media would be talking about this 24x7 if something was serious about this sexual assault investigation, the fact there is hardly no mention of it, is odd to me.
Think they’re waiting for more information to come out. Also worth noting we only heard of this because Dak sued her.you would think the media would be talking about this 24x7 if something was serious about this sexual assault investigation, the fact there is hardly no mention of it, is odd to me.
They’re not.you would think the media would be talking about this 24x7 if something was serious about this sexual assault investigation, the fact there is hardly no mention of it, is odd to me.
Since when does the media wait for more information? That never happensThink they’re waiting for more information to come out. Also worth noting we only heard of this because Dak sued her.
False on the second portion.Think they’re waiting for more information to come out. Also worth noting we only heard of this because Dak sued her.
He has no problem encouraging violence against refs.Maybe Dak gets the benefit of the doubt because he comes across as Mr. Nice Guy, ....
Yeah, was going to say, media loves jumping to conclusion if it gets ratings. In this case, there just doesn't seem to be anything of substance (yet) to accuser's case.Since when does the media wait for more information? That never happens
30 years ago maybe. It was nowhere perfect way back when but fact-checking often kept stories on standby until more information surfaced.The media knows it's bs.
Since when does a story break not from the media but the athlete because he countersued? They had no idea this happened. If Dak didn’t sue we would’ve never heard of it.Since when does the media wait for more information? That never happens
well she ain't messing with no broke broke brokeI have no real doubt that it's a gold digger play. Also, I'm so proud that we have such a classy guy leading the team.
The media can’t jump on anything they don’t know about. They don’t know anything about this case other then what Daks team has released.Yeah, was going to say, media loves jumping to conclusion if it gets ratings. In this case, there just doesn't seem to be anything of substance (yet) to accuser's case.
Wait.Guys stop worrying, let me reach out to my sources, i'll get them to do what they do best and air nothing but the cowboys. They never talk about the Bengals or the jaguars for no apparent reason. I'll get us some TV time, they can make up or add to the story, they can belittle the cowboys and say bad things about dak, dak will want to leave and we trade him. Story is over! BRB
They would. They have people who are paid to watch those court dockets and report this stuff. Just seems like it because to my knowledge, the first communication was a letter to Dak saying to pay up or it would come out in the press and courts. Dak counter-sues, they are forced to do their thing, and here we are.Since when does a story break not from the media but the athlete because he countersued? They had no idea this happened. If Dak didn’t sue we would’ve never heard of it.
With Watson his victims came out. Ray Rice the video came out.
How would the media know before the legal system? I get that you are going to go out of your way trying to protect Dak at all costs, but it's ridiculous to assume the media knows more about this case than the police or courts.The media knows it's bs.
Different types of media though. You can google it and find mass articles about it. Who isn't really covering it (or I'm yet to see) are the opinion pieces and debate shows. Those are going to be more patient on the subject with such a sensitive issue.Since when does the media wait for more information? That never happens