It works - 5 year cap impact from signing Perry, Bouye, RT

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Just ran a cap model for 2017-2021 with signing two top defensive FA (Bouye $15M AAV and Perry $13M AAV). Not only can we afford them, the cap situation actually improves during their 4 year contract! That is due to the massive cap available for 2019 and 2020. Free is also replaced with Wagner to get rid of his 3rd worst sack/pressures in the league. At the end of 2021, there is a surplus of $36M with this scenario.

Cap table: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2017...ry-bouye-and-wagner-2017-2021-while-improving

This is not an 1-year move - but at least a 3-year move to dominate. At the end of 2019, there is a net surplus of $20M even though the annual restructuring was unnecessary and eliminated after 2017. Furthermore, new contracts are only restructured once in their year 2.

Again what is the point of saving up tens of millions of salary cap space if we do not use it to win? Dez would be 31/32 in the 2020 season if he does not retire after the current contract... The next 3 years are clearly the best remaining years for the combination of Dez and Zeke.

WR_composite02_sm2.jpg


Other specifics:

1. Romo dead money all taken in 2017.

2. Followed rule 51 to account for # of players.

3. Used Cowboys 2017 rookie pool to estimate all future rookie pools with 10% increase per year.

4. WR2 and RB would be drafted instead of resigned. Though with Perry and Bouye, the draft can go almost BPA to increase the chance to continue drafting at least 1 probowler per year.

5. 2016 rookie class are assumed to get big contracts in 2020. If 1 of them does not pan out, then there would be even more cap space.

6. Surplus dollars are rolled into the next year, per NFL rules.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
No offense putty because I got nothing against you, but you must be a financial advisor or a politician. Those are the only people I know who spend this much time trying to spend other people's money.

lol i knew several politicians who will not be named here, and one of my roles was public relations.
also guilty of writing business plans so yes did some excel stuff
 
Last edited:

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Perry is just not very good. The QB's stumbled right at him on a ton of those sacks. He's been a bust for GB.

the point of the post was to show that the $ is there for 2 top FAs and the cap situation actually improves.
i dont watch any other team.
i dont recall perry, good or bad, in the games against us.
how did he stumble into 11 sacks?
 

Wolf2k5

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,565
Reaction score
1,246
the point of the post was to show that the $ is there for 2 top FAs and the cap situation actually improves.
i dont watch any other team.
i dont recall perry, good or bad, in the games against us.
how did he stumble into 11 sacks?

lol I'd kill to have a player that "accidentally" gets 10+ sacks
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Here you go guys.

Print this out, tape it to the wall.

O9d81uuxHh9xyjQXyaLPA63F7eJfUcYW7KjU10ORZW-4iPegpBHnBQ6sk0P1xuFj3VU=w300


it amazes me how some will not address the point but just draw lines in the sand.
this is a very conservatively constructed model that always error on the side of caution.
;)
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
A player that never gets more than 4 sacks in his career unless it's a contract year?

No ynanks..Perry is the type of player you let Tampa Bay or Jacksonville overpay.

that may be but i thought there was some reason for the prior lack of performance.
it is just me drawing a line in the sand that there is plenty of money.
i am not particularly fixed on any one player.
 
Top