It works - 5 year cap impact from signing Perry, Bouye, RT

MRCPS

Member
Messages
56
Reaction score
37
Bouye or Kirkpatrick would be great pick up at DB but I also believe the Cowboys should draft Adoree Jackson at 28 and if possible get the 2nd pick with some other draft choices for Romo in that 3 team trade between Cowboys, Commanders, and 49ers. Which would goes to Myles Garrett if he's there at the 2nd pick.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Bouye or Kirkpatrick would be great pick up at DB but I also believe the Cowboys should draft Adoree Jackson at 28 and if possible get the 2nd pick with some other draft choices for Romo in that 3 team trade between Cowboys, Commanders, and 49ers. Which would goes to Myles Garrett if he's there at the 2nd pick.

i doubt we have enough capital to pick garrett unless you trade away multiple drafts.
if we get bouye and kirkpatrick, the focus of the draft needs to be the DL.
 

tcain2004

Active Member
Messages
322
Reaction score
235
girl_steals_her_exs_phone_and_learns_a_lesson_the_hard_way_640_13.jpg


:laugh:


Omar from the wire did it better lol
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
it amazes me how some will not address the point but just draw lines in the sand.
this is a very conservatively constructed model that always error on the side of caution.
;)

What point? You handpicking players like this is Madden and expecting people to entertain it as a realistic approach to the offseason?
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
What point? You handpicking players like this is Madden and expecting people to entertain it as a realistic approach to the offseason?

the point of the post was to show that the $ is there for 2 top FAs and the cap situation actually improves.
i dont watch any other teams and first to admit i dont know much about the other FAs beyond reading about them on the internet.
the players picked are essentially placeholders for 'top FAs available'...

this is a financial argument.
not a player argument.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
it amazes me how some will not address the point but just draw lines in the sand.
this is a very conservatively constructed model that always error on the side of caution.
;)
Error on the side of caution... Meanwhile you model only the smallest of deals to the Cowboys.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
the point of the post was to show that the $ is there for 2 top FAs and the cap situation actually improves.
i dont watch any other teams and first to admit i dont know much about the other FAs beyond reading about them on the internet.
the players picked are essentially placeholders for 'top FAs available'...

this is a financial argument.
not a player argument.

People that are thinking we cannot sign significant FA with Romo of the books the next few years are delusional. We save $55m. That is a third of the current cap. I don't know why you feel the need to go through all this and beat people over the head with it. There are people that are by nature frugal and you are not going to change their minds no matter how much accounting you show them.

The oversight I see in your calculations are the Gachkar, Thornton, Mayowa, Bernadeau, and McClains of the world that the Cowboys like to sign to ensure roster depth. Stephen Jones is fond of 2 or so year deals at around $2-4m for those guys and we have had a high degree of success with them. We should continue to do so. WR4, LB4, OT3, OG3, RB2, TE2, CB4, S3, DT3, and the like are all key spots on the team for depth and ST.

We don't even have half a roster under contract for 2019 and expecting draft classes past the top 3 picks to make the roster is an unreasonable assumption. If you are paying the remainder all league minimum like you are doing by inserting the rule of 51 you are fielding a crap roster.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
People that are thinking we cannot sign significant FA with Romo of the books the next few years are delusional. We save $55m. That is a third of the current cap. I don't know why you feel the need to go through all this and beat people over the head with it. There are people that are by nature frugal and you are not going to change their minds no matter how much accounting you show them.

The oversight I see in your calculations are the Gachkar, Thornton, Mayowa, Bernadeau, and McClains of the world that the Cowboys like to sign to ensure roster depth. Stephen Jones is fond of 2 or so year deals at around $2-4m for those guys and we have had a high degree of success with them. We should continue to do so. WR4, LB4, OT3, OG3, RB2, TE2, CB4, S3, DT3, and the like are all key spots on the team for depth and ST.

We don't even have half a roster under contract for 2019 and expecting draft classes past the top 3 picks to make the roster is an unreasonable assumption. If you are paying the remainder all league minimum like you are doing by inserting the rule of 51 you are fielding a crap roster.

we have been droned (may be not you, i dont know) to believe that big FA expenditures will blow the cap up. i was fooled also. but when i took the trouble to build this model (1 hour only), it was obvious that we have been played for fools. it was not easy to blow the cap up even as i added one expensive FA after another. i wanted to make sure that became common knowledge even if it took a few posts.

in terms of roster construction, is it better to have more stars or more depth. if you have quality depth in the entire roster, then you are limiting the number of stars etc. do you fill out the bottom 25% of the roster with draft picks and UDFA? that is a long detailed argument. i am too tired right now to count the number of players in the 2019 roster, will answer that tomorrow.
 
Top