Jane Slater says Dont discount Micah Parsons at 10

[J817]

Wait, what?

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2020/...zing-teammate-as-alleged-in-federal-suit.html

 

[cowboyec]

 

[CowboyRoy]

You can draft another LB in rounds 2 or 3 that will make a difference.

We do not need an immature freelancer who sat out a season.

Parsons is as good a LB prospect that has come out in years. He is the defense version of Pitts.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Parsons would impact this defense more than Surtain and Horn combined.

I’m already calling him the Risen Star of this draft.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Parsons is the guy I want, tbh.

 

[reddyuta]

I dont even want him at 44.

 

[Vintage]

Parsons is the guy I want, tbh.

You mean you don’t want another Awuzie/Diggs type prospect at 10?

 

[AsthmaField]

Oh it's another one of these guys that doesn't think it matters who is playing cb

Dumb

 

[HungryLion]

I dont even want him at 44.

Come on man

 

[ScipioCowboy]

You mean you don’t want another Awuzie/Diggs type prospect at 10?

wait, what?

That’s what I’m passing up? Forget it, then.

 

[reddyuta]

Come on man

i am serious,he probably is worth a 1st rd pick but his off the field stuff is a serious turn off for me.

 

[Sheepherder]

Parsons is as good a LB prospect that has come out in years. He is the defense version of Pitts.

Works for me Roy. I just don't believe they'll take him.

 

[Hadenough]

Parsons could be a diva headache, we already have a few of those, one in particular who has a GIANT head to go along with the ache. So this would actually make sense for a perfect Jerry pick. Drops due to character concerns, immaturity issues, comes across as entitled, Jerry thinks he got a steal.

Wouldn’t surprise me at all, he’s made to be a Cowboy!

Either that or he becomes the leader of this defense and their enforcer.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Parsons is as good a LB prospect that has come out in years. He is the defense version of Pitts.

I completely disagree. Parsons is athletic and that's about it. Not good in coverage, struggles diagnosing plays, gets fooled by misdirection and has character/off the field concerns and not a very good teammate

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

What is it with you guys and these riddle me this thread titles?

 

[CowboyRoy]

I completely disagree. Parsons is athletic and that's about it. Not good in coverage, struggles diagnosing plays, gets fooled by misdirection and has character/off the field concerns and not a very good teammate

bla, bla, bla.............Havent seen any of that. You dont like him and are making it up. Off the field is overblown.

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

Yes or no isn’t he an awful person

 

[Irvin88_4life]

bla, bla, bla.............Havent seen any of that. You dont like him and are making it up. Off the field is overblown.

Watch the film. He is all projection and needs a ton of development.

You like him and therefore making it up that he is an every down, can do everything LB. Facts are though he isn't but has a ton of potential. Huge risk and I wouldn't draft him top 20.

 

[DoctorChicken]

I completely disagree. Parsons is athletic and that's about it. Not good in coverage, struggles diagnosing plays, gets fooled by misdirection and has character/off the field concerns and not a very good teammate

The people who are saying all this about how good he is have only seen the highlights.

I’m not saying Parsons won’t be a good player, but we don’t even know if the dude can cover yet. He’s not a top 10 pick.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

The people who are saying all this about how good he is have only seen the highlights.

I’m not saying Parsons won’t be a good player, but we don’t even know if the dude can cover yet. He’s not a top 10 pick.

Plus his character concerns are just that, a concern. Can we pick a guy with no off the field problems, or not such a huge risk.

As far as film, I haven't seen anything that says this guy is an every down LB or can do everything. My only explanation for the hype is athletic ability or like you said a highlight film