Idgit;4608362 said:
I've always liked Jaws. Personally, I think Romo's top-5, but there are enough good QBs out there that you can justify the order shifting in that second tier quite a bit. Anywhere in the top-10 I'm not going to consider it a slight.
I can't be as forgiving. I just don't see any reasonable justification for believing there are 9 QBs better than Tony Romo.
Jay Cutler? Joe Flacco?
This isn't a fan ranking these guys. This is supposed to be an NFL analyst ranking these guys for the "Worldwide Leader in Sports".
Romo's numbers are better than both Cutler and Flacco. So if an NFL analyst is going to defy the numbers for his rankings, he'd better have a darn good justification for doing so.
So what exactly is Jaws' justification?
Playoff wins, even though football is a team sport?
That may explain Flacco's ranking... but Cutler also has just 1 playoff win, and his overall win % is barely over .500. Oh, and he sat out much of the NFC Championship game because he had a boo-boo.
Or is it "clutch factor", even though Romo's 4th quarter QB rating (best among active QBs), among other stats, prove that the popular perception of Romo doesn't meet reality?
That's it. Those are the two silly criticisms of Romo, and the entire justification for the sports world to continue to underrate the guy despite his jaw-dropping numbers. 2nd best QB rating of all-time, yet only the 10th best QB today? Yeah, that makes sense. Not.
Guess I can't blame Jaws too much for his density. He's merely another sheep who's allowed popular opinion to cloud his better judgment.