haleyrules
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,060
- Reaction score
- 42,877
This guy:
That's him, right?
This guy:
That's him, right?
They said his nerve is firing and he can start moving his toes in a way he couldn't before.
That's called "progress", no idea what this guy is talking about.
Who are you going to believe? Lost of posts, nothing really concrete.who says they aren't? Is it they are not saying or you don't believe them?
Muscle fibers undergo atrophy as early as 3 weeks after denervation, with collagen deposits forming in the endomysium and the perimysium. However the structural architecture of the muscle and the end-plate integrity can be maintained for up to 1 year69,89. After 2 years, irreversible muscle fibrosis has occurred along with muscle degeneration, leading to a permanent loss of functional muscle tissue. Sensory end-organs such as Paccinian corpuscles, Meissner corpuscles and Merkel cells can last up to 2-3 years, so sensory function can still be recovered even after muscle function is permanently lost33. The time for growth supportive phenotypes of Schwann cells associated with target tissues are also limited90. Nerve transfers have been used to try and prevent denervation atrophy, but full strength and muscle function are seldom fully recovered91.
Recovery from a nerve injury is either early or not at all
Who are you going to believe? Lost of posts, nothing really concrete.
Is there any truth in his statement that "Recovery from nerve injury is usually early or not at all." and that the fact that only 12-15 months later we hear bit and pieces about him getting his feeling back is really a bad thing?
This guy:
That's him, right?
Was listening to xm radio and they said smith had some test done and the nerve was firing 5x as much as the previous month.
Not sure how credible this is . . . but some of the analytical points are worth noting . . . .
"Recovery from nerve injury is usually early or not at all.
At this point medically, it appears there is no way for the nerve to ever be 100 percent.
Smith has blown through the reported recovery estimate already, as his doctor initially indicated a three-month timeline from April of 2016. No question he had a top surgeon, who happens to be the Cowboys team doctor, but there is not much one can do about a nerve. It either does or doesn’t recover."
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...oys-nerve-update-minicamp-20170509-story.html
Actions speak louder than words. Our FO did not sign a free agent LB or draft one. That is all any of us needs to know at this point about the state of Jaylon Smith's recovery.
kinda catching up to this whole gloom and doom with jaylon as of late. is the whole fuss being about garrett's comments being that he wont do Rookie Ota's? is there more info?
I'm a doctor (though not an orthopedist) and I've looked into the subject a bit. Things I would note:
1. Dr. Chao is very qualified to discuss this topic, however, complete peroneal nerve palsy after total knee dislocation is a rare event, even for an orthopedic surgeon specializing in sports medicine. A 2014 meta-analysis of all published studies found only 214 documented cases in the literature. Of course, most cases are not published, but even still Dr. Chao has probably not personally seen enough patients with this condition all the way through their rehabilitation process to be able to statistically give an accurate assessment of their outcomes.
2. Looking through the literature, in a pt with complete peroneal palsy clinically there is about a 1/3 rate of adequate (not FULL) recovery. However, this includes patients that have persistently negative findings on EMG/NCS and clinical exam (which does not include Jaylon). Furthermore it includes pt with known severing of the nerve (this does not include Jaylon).
3. If patient demonstrated no neurologic recovery on EMG/NCS, they would not have continued to observe him for as long as they did. Jaylon mentioned early on that they did a test that had good news, likely implying that there was detectable nerve conduction even if there was no clinical improvement. That is why they continued to observe him. The prognosis in these patients is considered "good" in the literature I saw, but I'm not sure there is any study to document an exact rate of recovery. He now has FNC 1-2 reportedly (can move toes); 3 is considered "good" recovery
I think Jaylon has a good chance of reaching FNC 3 (meaning he can lift his foot off the ground against gravity). His chances of reaching full strength I think is pretty low. To what degree he is able to play football and at what level is also completely unknown. Dr. Chao notes that very few players have come back from this injury in the NFL. He fails to note that very few players have HAD this injury in the nfl. So who can and can't come back is not completely known.
I agree that people need to pump the brakes. The odds are still very much AGAINST Jaylon Smith. But I think he is exaggerating the degree of pessimism.
I'm a doctor (though not an orthopedist) and I've looked into the subject a bit. Things I would note:
1. Dr. Chao is very qualified to discuss this topic, however, complete peroneal nerve palsy after total knee dislocation is a rare event, even for an orthopedic surgeon specializing in sports medicine. A 2014 meta-analysis of all published studies found only 214 documented cases in the literature. Of course, most cases are not published, but even still Dr. Chao has probably not personally seen enough patients with this condition all the way through their rehabilitation process to be able to statistically give an accurate assessment of their outcomes.
2. Looking through the literature, in a pt with complete peroneal palsy clinically there is about a 1/3 rate of adequate (not FULL) recovery. However, this includes patients that have persistently negative findings on EMG/NCS and clinical exam (which does not include Jaylon). Furthermore it includes pt with known severing of the nerve (this does not include Jaylon).
3. If patient demonstrated no neurologic recovery on EMG/NCS, they would not have continued to observe him for as long as they did. Jaylon mentioned early on that they did a test that had good news, likely implying that there was detectable nerve conduction even if there was no clinical improvement. That is why they continued to observe him. The prognosis in these patients is considered "good" in the literature I saw, but I'm not sure there is any study to document an exact rate of recovery. He now has FNC 1-2 reportedly (can move toes); 3 is considered "good" recovery
I think Jaylon has a good chance of reaching FNC 3 (meaning he can lift his foot off the ground against gravity). His chances of reaching full strength I think is pretty low. To what degree he is able to play football and at what level is also completely unknown. Dr. Chao notes that very few players have come back from this injury in the NFL. He fails to note that very few players have HAD this injury in the nfl. So who can and can't come back is not completely known.
I agree that people need to pump the brakes. The odds are still very much AGAINST Jaylon Smith. But I think he is exaggerating the degree of pessimism.
I'm a doctor (though not an orthopedist) and I've looked into the subject a bit. Things I would note:
1. Dr. Chao is very qualified to discuss this topic, however, complete peroneal nerve palsy after total knee dislocation is a rare event, even for an orthopedic surgeon specializing in sports medicine. A 2014 meta-analysis of all published studies found only 214 documented cases in the literature. Of course, most cases are not published, but even still Dr. Chao has probably not personally seen enough patients with this condition all the way through their rehabilitation process to be able to statistically give an accurate assessment of their outcomes.
2. Looking through the literature, in a pt with complete peroneal palsy clinically there is about a 1/3 rate of adequate (not FULL) recovery. However, this includes patients that have persistently negative findings on EMG/NCS and clinical exam (which does not include Jaylon). Furthermore it includes pt with known severing of the nerve (this does not include Jaylon).
3. If patient demonstrated no neurologic recovery on EMG/NCS, they would not have continued to observe him for as long as they did. Jaylon mentioned early on that they did a test that had good news, likely implying that there was detectable nerve conduction even if there was no clinical improvement. That is why they continued to observe him. The prognosis in these patients is considered "good" in the literature I saw, but I'm not sure there is any study to document an exact rate of recovery. He now has FNC 1-2 reportedly (can move toes); 3 is considered "good" recovery
I think Jaylon has a good chance of reaching FNC 3 (meaning he can lift his foot off the ground against gravity). His chances of reaching full strength I think is pretty low. To what degree he is able to play football and at what level is also completely unknown. Dr. Chao notes that very few players have come back from this injury in the NFL. He fails to note that very few players have HAD this injury in the nfl. So who can and can't come back is not completely known.
I agree that people need to pump the brakes. The odds are still very much AGAINST Jaylon Smith. But I think he is exaggerating the degree of pessimism.