I am not sure I agree.
It's all about your scouting ability. If you believe your scouting then you take that QB who you had in the top 2-3 but dropped to 6.
Big Ben was 11th pick. Rodgers was 23 pick. Ponder and Gabbert were over drafted for sure. But I fall back to my scouting department.
I agree and see where you're going. However, we aint the Pittsburgh Steelers or the Packers.
The Steelers are a solid, stable franchise. They have a history of building and developing their talent. They had the coaching and the structure to take a chance on Big Ben and struck gold. Besides, they had Tommy Maddox as quarterback who isn't even in Romo's league. So it benefited Pittsburgh to make such a move.
In Green Bay's case, they still had Favre. And Favre had already won a Super Bowl and played in another. There was no urgency on Green Bay's part to get Favre a Super Bowl ring.
The Jags, the Vikings and the Browns - because they either have never won a Super Bowl or never been to a Super Bowl - were more in "gamble" mode. They hoped they had picked a quarterback to lead them to the next level, but, in reality, they were gambling against a history of futility.
Although Dallas has a richer history, we're desperate to get Tony Romo a Super Bowl. And I don't know if we're in the same place as the Packers and Steelers to pick a quarterback lower in the first round compared to where Green Bay and Pittsburgh are as organizations.
If that makes sense.