IceStar-D7
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,286
- Reaction score
- 8,352
Pull his towel off from his side and hope it's flag football. That's what the NFL is coming to...
I've always said Dak doesn't have a deep touch and it would be nice if he did like Russell Wilson of old. Great weapon to have for precisely moments like what unfolded yesterday.Lol no
That's nonsense.
And you'll be killing the guy when he misses a tackle because he was trying to hit a small target box.Go for the legs or waist to avoid any gray area for the refs to flag.
The legs and waist is smaller than the head?And you'll be killing the guy when he misses a tackle because he was trying to hit a small target box.
There is nothing to counter, you don't have an actual argument. No fact, no data, no information.It is nonsense.I've always said Dak doesn't have a deep touch and it would be nice if he did like Russell Wilson of old. Great weapon to have for precisely moments like what unfolded yesterday.
Nonsense seems to be your favorite word. I also notice that it's never followed up with a counter-argument or reasoning. Makes for a neat, abrupt exit. Next time I get pinned in a debate I'll use that.
Some actual data. Nice. And it shows that Dak is below average for what the distance was. Again, with that much room in the pocket (which yes, your data doesn't account for), it's all the more reason to make sure the receiver can at least get a hand on the ball. If it's nonsense to expect your top QB in the NFL to do at least that unharassed, then what do you have him for?There is nothing to counter, you don't have an actual argument. No fact, no data, no information.It is nonsense.
The idea that a ball that travels ~60 yards in the air is routine is preposterous. Completion percentage on balls that travel that far in the air is less than 50%. I don't know that it's tracked anywhere now, but here's Russ in 2019 at just over 30%.
https://www.sharpfootballstats.com/comp---by-target-depth.html
Like there's nothing to substantiate your point, so I don't even know how to counter argue. All you're going to say now is "that doesn't account for pocket or WR being open blah blah blah." You don't want counter-arguments, because you can't actually articulate an argument. I don't know what to call that other than nonsense.
You're making 10 different points and none of them are what I'm talking about.Some actual data. Nice. And it shows that Dak is below average for what the distance was. Again, with that much room in the pocket (which yes, your data doesn't account for), it's all the more reason to make sure the receiver can at least get a hand on the ball. If it's nonsense to expect your top QB in the NFL to do at least that unharassed, then what do you have him for?
Guess we'll just continue getting owned by the refs until we can do the things powerhouse teams can do. Until then I guess it's "hey ma, no fair!" time on the interwebs. Lol.
You mean when your emotions tell you that you know what constitutes a penalty more than they do in the first place. Did you forget what thread you're in, Mahomes?You're making 10 different points and none of them are what I'm talking about.
The only thing I'm talking about is that the idea that the throw is "routine" is stupid. It's not supported by anything.
Like, you can get screwed by the refs and there are opportunities to make plays. Both things can exist. Not complaining about the refs doesn't make you tough or smart or whatever you are trying to be. It's simple math when refs put points on or take points off the board.
Again, this is nonsense. I don't even know what you're talking about, and you're not responding to anything I said.You mean when your emotions tell you that you know what constitutes a penalty more than they do in the first place. Did you forget what thread you're in, Mahomes?
Rocket Surgery?Go for the legs or waist?
It’s not rocket surgery.
Beg to differ. ANYTIME, ANYWHERE is the right time to call attention to gross inadequacies or agendas in a game that used to be so fine. What's the old saying: "The only thing necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to stand by and do (say) nothing."I agree. But bring it up in rules committee through proper channels. Social Media'ing it after a loss when whole team just gave up not the right time.
Rocket surgery?Go for the legs or waist?
It’s not rocket surgery.
No, I'm saying that if you're going to accuse me of "making stuff up" about how powerhouse teams are able to overcome calls by refs, well then you're doing the same damn thing in making up what's a "ticky-tack" foul or not. Ticky-tack meaning "it went against my team therefore it's ticky-tack." Ain't nothing more made up in people's minds than that after a loss around here. What thread are you in again? Fight fire with fire I guess, eh Mac? Lol.Again, this is nonsense. I don't even know what you're talking about, and you're not responding to anything I said.
Your argument is that the refs get all the calls right? lmao.
i’m not sure that’s blame. it’s asking for actual clarification. wouldn’t have changed the game so i don’t mind itNot saying I disagree, but please stop blaming the officiating. Losers blame refs. Suck it up and win.
having a hard time tracking your argument. Seems like you’re just throwing spaghetti against the wall to see if it sticks.Some actual data. Nice. And it shows that Dak is below average for what the distance was. Again, with that much room in the pocket (which yes, your data doesn't account for), it's all the more reason to make sure the receiver can at least get a hand on the ball. If it's nonsense to expect your top QB in the NFL to do at least that unharassed, then what do you have him for?
Guess we'll just continue getting owned by the refs until we can do the things powerhouse teams can do. Until then I guess it's "hey ma, no fair!" time on the interwebs. Lol.
I don't know what you're babbling about.No, I'm saying that if you're going to accuse me of "making stuff up" about how powerhouse teams are able to overcome calls by refs, well then you're doing the same damn thing in making up what's a "ticky-tack" foul or not. Ticky-tack meaning "it went against my team therefore it's ticky-tack." Ain't nothing more made up in people's minds than that after a loss around here. What thread are you in again? Fight fire with fire I guess, eh Mac? Lol.