Jerry said we are hitching our wagons to Romo.

lcharles

Negativity King
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
1
Is Tony beyond being benched? What would have to happen for Romo to be benched?


Paging Gary Hogeboom. :eek:
 
If he keeps it up don't expect to hear this in the offseason.

If the opportunity presents itself in the draft the Cowboys will make a move.
 
CATCH17;4158641 said:
If he keeps it up don't expect to hear this in the offseason.

If the opportunity presents itself in the draft the Cowboys will make a move.

the only problem is - there wont be an opportunity...8-8 = no QB for us
 
Jerry said we are hitching our wagons to Romo.

I guess seatbelts wont be any help then
 
GloryDaysRBack;4158649 said:
the only problem is - there wont be an opportunity...8-8 = no QB for us


That's probably correct.

But outside of Luck I'm not sure what QB I'd be interested in this coming year anyway. And honestly I'm not thinkign about that cause I'm not one of the people who believes Romo can't win for us.
 
Romo is our guy as of right now.

That being said, either Foles, Tannehill, Lindley or Griffin will be a Cowboy next year IMO.
 
GloryDaysRBack;4158649 said:
the only problem is - there wont be an opportunity...8-8 = no QB for us



Yeah.. Who knows.. Maybe he'll get Favre or Warner out of retirement..


It's time for the Cowboys to get in the QB market though... Sadly...
 
BraveHeartFan;4158662 said:
That's probably correct.

But outside of Luck I'm not sure what QB I'd be interested in this coming year anyway. And honestly I'm not thinkign about that cause I'm not one of the people who believes Romo can't win for us.

no offense..but how many of these blunders is it going to take for you to think otherwise?
 
BraveHeartFan;4158662 said:
That's probably correct.

But outside of Luck I'm not sure what QB I'd be interested in this coming year anyway. And honestly I'm not thinkign about that cause I'm not one of the people who believes Romo can't win for us.

To win immedately? Probably no one. But spending a second on a QB to develop for a few years before Romo departs might be a good idea.
 
windward;4158663 said:
Romo is our guy as of right now.

That being said, either Foles, Tannehill, Lindley or Griffin will be a Cowboy next year IMO.

Maybe the Rams will get the #1 pick and we could offer them something for Luck.
 
GloryDaysRBack;4158672 said:
no offense..but how many of these blunders is it going to take for you to think otherwise?

*Shrugs*

I don't know.

I'm stubborn I guess because I don't decide rather I like, or hate, trust, or don't trust, Romo from game to game.

I find it hard to say that I don't believe Romo can win, or do anything worthwhile, when we just saw him play very well the last couple of games, taking charge and bringing his teams back, while minimzing mistakes, and then one week later pretend that it's impossible for him to do so again.



windward;4158674 said:
To win immedately? Probably no one. But spending a second on a QB to develop for a few years before Romo departs might be a good idea.


Yeah there is never anything wrong with that.
 
This is exactly what we should do. I know people are all emotional and stuff but there is not a better option.
 
I would love for things to chill between Romo and the team. That's what needs to happen. But as Jerry said, our wagons are hitched.
 
Like I said earlier this year, the Cowboys should have traded up to the first pick to get Cam Newton.

Cowboys would have been underfeated this year if we had Cam Newton, why?, because he has much better blocking and much more weapons in Dallas then in Carolina. Cam being in Dallas would have been a match made in heaven. If he ever comes to Dallas it would be a match made in heaven.

I believe more in Cowboys a Cam Newton away from a superbowl then a Tony Fumble Romo....
 
It would easier to replace the OC then the QB at this point. Let JG be the HC and learn and get someone else to call plays and manage Romo and company.
 
What other current NFL QB would be posting better stats than Romo with the current playcalling and supporting cast?

Romo is asked to win games pretty much on his own. Even when the team is leading, he is asked to close out the game via the play calls. He is asked to throw the ball 40 times and that mean the game is on him, good or bad.

Sometimes the defense shows up (more this year) sometimes not. Once upon a time, the team had a running game, mostly not anymore. OL has been shaky for years...

Romo needs a fricking running game and a coach/OC that will actually call running plays.
 
RealCowboyfan;4158699 said:
Like I said earlier this year, the Cowboys should have traded up to the first pick to get Cam Newton.

Cowboys would have been underfeated this year if we had Cam Newton, why?, because he has much better blocking and much more weapons in Dallas then in Carolina. Cam being in Dallas would have been a match made in heaven. If he ever comes to Dallas it would be a match made in heaven.

I believe more in Cowboys a Cam Newton away from a superbowl then a Tony Fumble Romo....
It was a stupid idea then and nothing has changed.
 
Wolfpack;4158720 said:
What other current NFL QB would be posting better stats than Romo with the current playcalling and supporting cast?

Romo is asked to win games pretty much on his own. Even when the team is leading, he is asked to close out the game via the play calls. He is asked to throw the ball 40 times and that mean the game is on him, good or bad.

Sometimes the defense shows up (more this year) sometimes not. Once upon a time, the team had a running game, mostly not anymore. OL has been shaky for years...

Romo needs a fricking running game and a coach/OC that will actually call running plays.

:bow: (RECOMMENDED):bow:
 
RealCowboyfan;4158699 said:
I believe more in Cowboys a Cam Newton away from a superbowl then a Tony Fumble Romo....

There is a joke in there somewhere.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,370
Messages
14,533,379
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top