jterrell
Penguinite
- Messages
- 33,859
- Reaction score
- 15,962
Holley is part of the attention seeking cycle as he looks to stay employed in media.
BUT he is nowhere near the bad actors that openly make things up and play a character on tv/radio/pod for attention.
He is 100% correct in that eye in the sky film has no true correlation to seeing the game at field level and at game speed.
It is hilarious to see people point out a guy with 5 yards of space is "open" when an NFL DB is closing into that area.
The Dak thing isn't complicated AT ALL.
He's graded out by 1000 metrics and all of them detail an accurate, productive QB that takes care of the ball.
He is good but not elite and really doesn't need to be mentioned every few seconds and after every loss or win unless your brain is incapable of processing the actuality you are seeing.
Last week was extreme example of just how goofy some fans and talking fans can be when trying to blame any aspect of that loss on the QB.
That was a Pro Bowl level performance.
BUT he is nowhere near the bad actors that openly make things up and play a character on tv/radio/pod for attention.
He is 100% correct in that eye in the sky film has no true correlation to seeing the game at field level and at game speed.
It is hilarious to see people point out a guy with 5 yards of space is "open" when an NFL DB is closing into that area.
The Dak thing isn't complicated AT ALL.
He's graded out by 1000 metrics and all of them detail an accurate, productive QB that takes care of the ball.
He is good but not elite and really doesn't need to be mentioned every few seconds and after every loss or win unless your brain is incapable of processing the actuality you are seeing.
Last week was extreme example of just how goofy some fans and talking fans can be when trying to blame any aspect of that loss on the QB.
That was a Pro Bowl level performance.