Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,296
- Reaction score
- 38,882
Remember there’s not an induction committee or sports writers like with HOF. It’s all decided by one person. The Football Idiot.Should be in the ROH yesterday
Remember there’s not an induction committee or sports writers like with HOF. It’s all decided by one person. The Football Idiot.Should be in the ROH yesterday
Don’t forget Aikmans horrid start and those 3 early turnovers which put us in 21-0 hole.3 factors in the 94 NFC championship loss:
1. Loss of players - Norton in particular
2. 49ers were a very good team, if Dallas was the best, they were 2nd
3. Switzer wasn't the disciplinarian that Jimmy was - after the first turnover in the game, Jimmy would have lit up the team and likely that would have been the only turnover, but Switzer did nothing, and it just snowballed from there.
Jimmy could have lost the game, but I doubt he would have...
Yep. Jerry proved anyone of 500 coaches could win with that team. Congratulations!!I give Switzer credit for winning with Jimmy's team. As he himself said, he could have lost with that team too. lol
Yea, each year that goes by proves that Jerry had less to do with building the 90's super bowl team than he cares to admit......it was 100% Jimmy.
Don’t forget Aikmans horrid start and those 3 early turnovers which put us in 21-0 hole.
Huge Jimmy fan here.
But Jimmy and Jerry built the cap-less 90s Cowboys champions
Jimmy had some the best team of assistant coaches...paid for by Jerry...in NFL history
And the Cowboys DID win a Super Bowl without Jimmy coaching. “His players” or not, they did it without him coaching. And Jimmy never won an NFL title anywhere else.
Again, Im a huge Jimmy fan. But the legend is sometimes a bit much
Do you really think the former captain of a college national champion and someone who has worked with or around Parcells, Johnson, and so many others...is a “football idiot”?This^^^^^
The Football Idiot is still determined to prove that wasn’t all about Jimmy. Tick tock....
There’s no guarantee we win even if we get that call on Irvin.And the non-PI call against Deion on Irvin compounded by the 15-yard Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Barry. We had ole mo up to that point and I believe would've won absent that debacle.
Don’t forget Aikmans horrid start and those 3 early turnovers which put us in 21-0 hole.
Yes I do and here’s why because he continues to remain GM even when he’s admitted he’d of fired a GM with his recent record which his meddling prevents us from having a normal situation of command which would attract a greater front office and coaching staff that had more control over football operations. That’s idiocy if Jerry believes he knows best.Do you really think the former captain of a college national champion and someone who has worked with or around Parcells, Johnson, and so many others...is a “football idiot”?
Sure, those great coaches are more football savvy, but I dont think a high IQ guy (and yes, he is that) that’s been around the sport for 50+ is football idiot.
Of course.No doubt Jerry had something to do with the 3 SB wins, but I have read too many interviews and seen too many interviews with people like Randy Galloway, Larry Lacewell, Frank Broyles and others that stated that early on Jimmy was in near-total control of the team, from selecting players to negotiating contracts to the actual coaching to determining his assistant coaches. Why would anyone believe that Jerry spent 25 years in the oil business while Jimmy spent 25 years coaching and yet somehow Jerry had great input to the coaching end of the business? We know that Jerry wanted Emmitt and Jimmy wanted Francis, and they got Emmitt, but the reason they got Emmitt was because Francis was selected 12th by the Bengals, so he wasn't available at 15, the Cowboys pick. If Francis had been there at 15 Jimmy would have gotten his way, but regardless Francis never panned out, so I give Jerry credit for wanting Emmitt instead.
But that's one player in one draft, hardly enough to indicate Jerry had this huge impact on the 3 SB wins. Jerry is no doubt a very smart guy, but intelligence means the ability to learn, not the actual knowledge. I'm sure we've all heard the old joke about Henry Kissinger on the plane, which had engine trouble and he took some guys backpack and jumped out of the plane, in other words he didn't have the knowledge about what a parachute looked like.
As years went on I do think Jerry got more and more football knowledge, but saying he had as much input as Jimmy early on doesn't make sense...
No doubt Jerry had something to do with the 3 SB wins, but I have read too many interviews and seen too many interviews with people like Randy Galloway, Larry Lacewell, Frank Broyles and others that stated that early on Jimmy was in near-total control of the team, from selecting players to negotiating contracts to the actual coaching to determining his assistant coaches. Why would anyone believe that Jerry spent 25 years in the oil business while Jimmy spent 25 years coaching and yet somehow Jerry had great input to the coaching end of the business? We know that Jerry wanted Emmitt and Jimmy wanted Francis, and they got Emmitt, but the reason they got Emmitt was because Francis was selected 12th by the Bengals, so he wasn't available at 15, the Cowboys pick. If Francis had been there at 15 Jimmy would have gotten his way, but regardless Francis never panned out, so I give Jerry credit for wanting Emmitt instead.
But that's one player in one draft, hardly enough to indicate Jerry had this huge impact on the 3 SB wins. Jerry is no doubt a very smart guy, but intelligence means the ability to learn, not the actual knowledge. I'm sure we've all heard the old joke about Henry Kissinger on the plane, which had engine trouble and he took some guys backpack and jumped out of the plane, in other words he didn't have the knowledge about what a parachute looked like.
As years went on I do think Jerry got more and more football knowledge, but saying he had as much input as Jimmy early on doesn't make sense...
I hear you.Yes I do and here’s why because he continues to remain GM even when he’s admitted he’d of fired a GM with his recent record which his meddling prevents us from having a normal situation of command which would attract a greater front office and coaching staff that had more control over football operations. That’s idiocy if Jerry believes he knows best.
Which I don’t think he actually believes but his insistence on gaining credit for being a football guy placing his personal agendas above what’s best for Cowboys football should bring every Cowboy fan on his or hers feet in protest. It’s preventing us a greater opportunity for success which is either the kind of selfishness which totally disgust me or again Idiocy.
I understand his football history and obviously he knows football or we wouldn’t be as relevant as we have been but Idiocy to believe he as GM and his Son as VP provides us the best opportunity for success. If he does then it’s worse Idiocy than I thought.
I’d agree to a point but there’s still been enough poor risk that have Jerry’s stamp on them. And the results aren’t any better.I hear you.
But I tend to think the drafting and personnel decisions have gotten better lately. He doesn't seem to be dominating the decision making anymore, which you seem to be implying he still is.
I hear you.
But I tend to think the drafting and personnel decisions have gotten better lately. He doesn't seem to be dominating the decision making anymore, which you seem to be implying he still is.
But to assume he’s not still in the mix and making final decisions is naive
I don’t believe he wants another title unless he recieves the credit he’s been pursuing .I agree, I think Jerry realizes what's been done the last 25 years isn't working, as far as SBs is concerned, and he also realizes his time is running out, if he wants another title he'd better try something different..
Ultimately whether there’s some better decisions being made it will be measured by the success on the field.I don't think many are of the opinion that he's not "in the mix", only that his influence is less than it was from say, 1995 to 2010 or so.
Personally I think he's "groomed" Stephen to eventually take over when Jerry is gone or unable to function, and goes with Stephen, and others' opinions more and more.
If he listens to Stephen and agrees to say, sign Martin asap, then just because Jerry makes the "final" decision, it doesn't mean he is in total control of the process, whereas years ago he was...
I don’t believe he wants another title unless he recieves the credit he’s been pursuing