M'Kevon;3839143 said:
So, now that I proved you wrong,
you changed the requirements. You said I couldn't name 3 people who retired. I named four.
Tucker did not recover from his knee surgery. He played one year, then retired because (his words) his knee never recovered.
Jones could have continued his career for more than 12 years, but the knee injury cut it short. Not rehap. The injury itself.
It is easy to name the ones who recover. They make headlines, interviews and more importantly, continue to play.
The ones that don't recover are never heard from again, except through announcement of release or retirement.
You are making a bad argument. You cite the successes and are willfully blind to the failures.
Nice playing. I'll leave you to your self imposed ignorance.
Nope, didn't change the requirements at all, just assumed that you would respond with an answer that met a certain level of intellect.
Obviously, that was a mistake.
At first, I thought I was just correcting your original ignorant claim. Now I'm seeing you're ignorant and intellectually dishonest.
Tucker retired after 12-years in the league and staring a eight-game suspension in the face if he chose to come back. From your previous posts I wouldn't expect you to muster up the intellectual honesty needed to see the connection.
The average NFL career is 3.5 seasons.
Ryan Tucker and Walter Jones both retired at the end of their 12 and 13-year careers.
What's next, are you going to tell us that Brett Favre retired because of a debilitating ankle injury, or just maybe it was because he's done physically alltogether after his 20th season?
Are you going to claim Joey Galloway had to retire after 16 seasons due to the knee tear he suffered in 2000?
"(Walter) Jones could have continued his career for more than 12 years."
Yeah, clearly you're not familiar with Walter Jones as he was on his last leg going into that last season. He had microfracture on his knee, which is a whole other can of worms, as well as injured his back in training camp his last season before being placed on injured reserve.
You say it's easy for you to name the ones that recover, that's because players come back from knee injuries regularly. I gave you a short list of players that have come back from knee surgery. Surely, you recognize those names. Why? Because they were all good enough players to have long careers in the league.
Again, the attrition rate in the NFL is 3.5 seasons. That includes a nearly endless list of names of guys who simply weren't good enough make it or dig out a career in the NFL, not because they couldn't come back from knee surgery.
Give me a guy at or somewhere near his prime, not on his last-leg in his 12-13th season, that could not make it back from a basic knee tear (as was John Phillips...ACL tear).
Sean Lee is another example of a player that's made it back.
You gave me John DiGiorgio, yet what you failed to mention is that he was waived from the Bills because he couldn't pass a physical due to bone damage to his knee.
Of course, I'm sure you'll say "bone damage...ligament damage...same thing."
My point from the jump is that knee surgeries are not uncommon and that far more players come back from them than those who are forced to retire as you ignorantly claim.
Gotta love your argument from silence
"The ones that don't recover are never heard from again, except through announcement of release or retirement."
So in four seasons you've named me a guy in his 12th season facing a 8-game suspension; a guy in his 13th season who was suffering from a litany of other injuries; a guy (DiGiorgio) who retired from an entirely different circumstance (bone damage); and Mike Rucker, who had microfracture surgery.