That's not a conflict of interest
EDIT: His firm did, he may not have
That's not a conflict of interest
EDIT: His firm did, he may not have
From the team point of view, yes. From the individual who is accused of something he claims he is innocent of that will greatly impact his financial future and possibly linger over him the rest of his life while also putting him at risk of a lifetime ban for one mere accusation from someone else, it's a completely different set of priorities. I think it's also safe to say that most people, assuming they had the financial means to afford it, would fight something like this non-stop because not doing so would end up being worse than any 6 week punishment would offer.All that's happened is instead of missing the first six games (and probably be 3-3 anyway) now he will miss six far more important games.
From the team point of view, yes. From the individual who is accused of something he claims he is innocent of that will greatly impact his financial future and possibly linger over him the rest of his life while also putting him at risk of a lifetime ban for one mere accusation from someone else, it's a completely different set of priorities. I think it's also safe to say that most people, assuming they had the financial means to afford it, would fight something like this non-stop because not doing so would end up being worse than any 6 week punishment would offer.
I don't neceessarily think it is a conflict of interest but I do think they could have talked about the case and how the CBA was worded to allow Goodell to do this sort of thing. That, in and of itself could have affected her decision rather than the exact merits of this case and the fundamental unfairness involved in it. Could have changed her entire perspective on the case.
The ruling was drafted ahead of time even before the hearing last night.
Maybe the judge took a lot of time to give the impression she was actually thinking this through and drafting the ruling, when in fact it already was done... I wouldn't put it past the whole lot...
Considering they all the other Judges who have heard this case all believed the bolded to be a legit argument. I would say that if 100% impacted her decision. The next CBA is new a few years, and I am sure we can guess which law firm wants in on that.
Absolutely. This is BLATANTLY corrupt. Almost laughably so.Considering they all the other Judges who have heard this case all believed the bolded to be a legit argument. I would say that if 100% impacted her decision. The next CBA is new a few years, and I am sure we can guess which law firm wants in on that.
Good point regarding the law firm wanting in on the next CBA... This brings up Jerry though.. A CBA like this last one benefits him as an owner....