dbair1967
Arch Defender
- Messages
- 30,782
- Reaction score
- 1
iceberg said:how many players on our line now would have started for the cowboys in 92-93?
none...some of the starters on this OL wouldnt even be backups on that team
David
iceberg said:how many players on our line now would have started for the cowboys in 92-93?
Gibbs II said:Im sure helping the O-line will help you guys tremendously, but lets not forget the holes and problems on the entire football team.
Also, one part of your demise was the ability to come out flat periodically.
burmafrd said:Actuall The Hotel might very well have started for that 92-93 team; the other tackle from Williams was not great. RIvera at his peak could also be in the fight for starting. Step, Nate, Williams were great; but Gogan and Tuinie were not that great- though they were very good. Now I admit straight up that PROBABLY only Johnson would be able to play backup- the rest of what we have could not have made the team. BUT remember this: NO ONE has a line like that anymore- and probably will never have one like it again. The sum of its parts were greater then it looked- they played great as a UNIT.
btcutter said:It's is painfully obvious to me that our OL is the cause of our demise last year and will be again if we don't draft some good players here ( I am not hanging my hope on a bunch of underachievers, coming off injury 30 somthing tackles and last yr's rookie that got burnt so often that I can smell the burn at home):bang2: . Why is it that almost everyone wants our 1st pick be a OLB???
IF the BPA is a OLB so be it.....but, I much prefer moving down if at all possible to pick up an extra 2nd or 3rd to shore up the OL. Yeah, OLB is a much sexier pick and may help us rack up a few more sacks but like I posted before....I can live with our current LB corp but not with the current OL. Our OL will cost us more games than our LB's. It ruined our playoff birth for sure last yr.
junk said:The defense also had issues stopping the run and rushing the passer.
Drafting OL isn't a sure fire fix. See Gurode, Peterman, Rogers.
johnnybluestar said:Doesn't anybody remember that we struggled to run the ball before Flozell Adams got hurt?
btcutter said:It's is painfully obvious to me that our OL is the cause of our demise last year and will be again if we don't draft some good players here ( I am not hanging my hope on a bunch of underachievers, coming off injury 30 somthing tackles and last yr's rookie that got burnt so often that I can smell the burn at home):bang2: . Why is it that almost everyone wants our 1st pick be a OLB???
IF the BPA is a OLB so be it.....but, I much prefer moving down if at all possible to pick up an extra 2nd or 3rd to shore up the OL. Yeah, OLB is a much sexier pick and may help us rack up a few more sacks but like I posted before....I can live with our current LB corp but not with the current OL. Our OL will cost us more games than our LB's. It ruined our playoff birth for sure last yr.
Gibbs II said:Im sure helping the O-line will help you guys tremendously, but lets not forget the holes and problems on the entire football team.
Also, one part of your demise was the ability to come out flat periodically.
peplaw06 said:YAWN... Again with the coming out flat?? I guess the RedStinks never came out flat huh? Forget the 36-0 romp in NY... forget the Cowboys game where you were down 13-0 (yes I know what happened, that's beside the point), forget the TB and Denver games where you were down 21-10.
EVERYONE comes out flat now and again. :bang2:
kartr said:The OL didn't make Bledsoe throw to a double-covered Terry Glenn in the Seattle game, nor Champ Bailey in the Denver game or not look for Jason Witten in the Raider game or the first Commander game. That's four losses that Bledsoe was the primary culprit with poor decisions. In the second Eagle game he contributed an int by holding the ball instead of throwing to an open Jason Witten;he didn't try to throw it until a man was draped all over him and when he had no pressure on him he didn't throw it. Only the Eagles stupidity in not trying to run out the clock and Roy Williams heroics saved that one from being another Bledsoe loss. Sure the OL had problems, but they can't make the decisions for Bledsoe. Just what is it that you don't get?
kartr said:The OL didn't make Bledsoe throw to a double-covered Terry Glenn in the Seattle game, nor Champ Bailey in the Denver game or not look for Jason Witten in the Raider game or the first Commander game. That's four losses that Bledsoe was the primary culprit with poor decisions. In the second Eagle game he contributed an int by holding the ball instead of throwing to an open Jason Witten;he didn't try to throw it until a man was draped all over him and when he had no pressure on him he didn't throw it. Only the Eagles stupidity in not trying to run out the clock and Roy Williams heroics saved that one from being another Bledsoe loss. Sure the OL had problems, but they can't make the decisions for Bledsoe. Just what is it that you don't get?