Just for fun - kind of - but seriously. (Hillis)

Dallas has a 1st and a 3rd and a 4th currently invested in that position.

People say the line isn't getting it done, what does Hillis do about that?

Build the team, not the RB position.

It's not like he'd be utilized anyway.
 
Where did you see he is on the verge of requesting a trade? If he was in that mindset he would've held out rather than reporting to training camp. Kinda hard to ask for too much when you're a one year wonder until you prove otherwise.
 
While I can definately see where having Hillis would be pretty dang cool to see but the cap hit when he got the new deal he wanted would be terrible for us.
 
Would love to pick him up but dont see the browns trading him at all. I get we have bigger needs but the run game is obviously a need considering our game against the jets we couldn't punch it in when Tony fumbled on 3rd down and the lions game which we didnt run at all. So technically it is a need
 
Chocolate Lab;4167412 said:
Would love to have him, but it would cost too much and his contract will probably be too high, too. I wouldn't pay RBs too much, especially the bruiser type. We saw that with Barber.

Love Hillis' game, though. Would be awesome to see he and Felix teamed up again.

Yeah, I could be wrong, but I don't think Hillis is going to have a very long career, at least not as a top back. He delivers and takes a lot of punishment.
 
VThokie7;4167614 said:
Where did you see he is on the verge of requesting a trade? If he was in that mindset he would've held out rather than reporting to training camp. Kinda hard to ask for too much when you're a one year wonder until you prove otherwise.

All I've read is that he's very happy in Cleveland and the Browns are trying to work out a long-term deal. I don't think the "t" word is even in their thoughts, unless they are thinking about "tough."
 
Hoofbite;4167581 said:
Dallas has a 1st and a 3rd and a 4th currently invested in that position.

People say the line isn't getting it done, what does Hillis do about that?

Build the team, not the RB position.

It's not like he'd be utilized anyway.

I agree.

It makes no sense to trade for a quality RB right now when the blocking is so poor.
 
VThokie7;4167614 said:
Where did you see he is on the verge of requesting a trade? If he was in that mindset he would've held out rather than reporting to training camp. Kinda hard to ask for too much when you're a one year wonder until you prove otherwise.

Maybe that's why he didn't hold out.
 
CalCBFan;4167397 said:
I'm not so sure I agree w/ you. Goose said on Hitzges' show that we need a big back that can get us 1 yard when we need it ala the run at the goal on our 2nd possession of the game. I think I'd at least look into it if I were Jerry...

No team is going to pay Hillis what he will demand to simply be used as a part time short yardage back. It just isn't going to happen. He's a starter and will get paid starter money.
 
Star4Ever;4167677 said:
No team is going to pay Hillis what he will demand to simply be used as a part time short yardage back. It just isn't going to happen. He's a starter and will get paid starter money.

just bc we need him mostly for short yardage and goal line carries doesnt mean we cant use him regularly..
 
Star4Ever;4167677 said:
No team is going to pay Hillis what he will demand to simply be used as a part time short yardage back. It just isn't going to happen. He's a starter and will get paid starter money.

As he should be. I don't believe there is a snowball's chance in Hades that the Cowboys could get Hillis, but I would be very happy if they did:D
 
GloryDaysRBack;4167678 said:
just bc we need him mostly for short yardage and goal line carries doesnt mean we cant use him regularly..

And what are we going to do with the FOUR RBs already on the roster? Felix is the starter and that's not going to change.
 
If were going to pass this much, id like us to have a big power back who will " fall forward" if you would. Than choice or Felix with added weight... Not sure with Murray. Id love to see him get bulk of carries at somepoint... All for it if we would do it.
 
No point in giving up anything for a RB before we learn how to actually run block
 
Star4Ever;4167688 said:
And what are we going to do with the FOUR RBs already on the roster? Felix is the starter and that's not going to change.

Choice is good for nothing..I'm ok w outright cutting that scrub..might as well throw him in the trade. So what if Felix starts. We can still use Hillis.
 
I love Hillis style and heart, but definitely has a limited shelf life. Taking that kind of pounding will lead to a short career, but I think also takes it toll over the course of a season as well. Watching him last year, the injuries and pounding started to take their toll and he wasn't as effective that last third or so of the season. If you could get him for practically nothing, that's great, but i don't think it would be worth what we would have to give up to get him. I would love to have a big bruising back for getting those tough short yards, but think that's something you draft or sign undrafted free agent for.
 
Looks like Peyton Hillis has fell out of favour in Cleveland and since Tashard Choice is kind of redundant in Dallas I was wondering if a one for one swap makes sense. Pure speculation on my part of course, but I figure neither team would have much to lose and Hillis gives the 'Boys a short yardage presence, while Choice might be a good fit paired with the power runnning Hardesty.
Is this something you guys would be happy with? Would Choice be enough for Hillis (who is a FA)?
 
Who in their right mind would trade a probowl rb for a career 3rd string rb??
 
CarlAllDay;4167943 said:
Who in their right mind would trade a probowl rb for a career 3rd string rb??

If we included a second round pick then possibly but other wise you are right. who in the blue hell would want a guy who never cracked a 100 yrd game for a pro bowler and madden cover guy!!!!
 
Back
Top