Just think what Hoyte would do at LB

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Stautner;1137676 said:
FB and LB are not the same position. They require a similar mentality, but the skills are different. At FB he doesn't have to chase down, fight through blocks and tackle people - the people he blocks are coming to him because he is in between them and the ball carrier.

In other words, being a good FB doesn't automatically translate into being a good LB, even for someone more experienced at LB.

Like hitting a gold ball(that doesnt move) and hitting a baseball that does :lmao2:
 

dankman

Member
Messages
64
Reaction score
47
tomson75;1137064 said:
So basically what you're saying is...you want to take a player whom isn't as good as two or three others at LB and start him because he "blows people up." At the same time, take away a player from the f-back postition, a primary blocking position in which we lack depth and any aggressiveness at.

No thanks. Until he proves he can legitimately beat out any of our inside LB's, lets keep him at a position where he's made headlines in a matter of only two weeks. IMO.[/quot

I could not agree with you more. It would be nice to have a decent blocking FB for the first time since you know who. Keep him on Offense.

-Daniel
 
Top