Justin Harrell

Pokes28

Member
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
Harrell isn't the prototype NT, but then again, Jamal Williams from SD (who wasn't that dominating when he was at Oklahoma State BTW) was much the same player as Harrell.

Personally, I think that Harrell could be a great NT in a 3-4.

David Harrell (no relation) - Pokes
dwh
 

Manster68

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
1,710
I wouldn't mind Justin Harrell. I think that Dallas could trade down a few spots lower in the first round and take him there (and pick up an extra 3rd round pick).

Dallas could then package that extra 3rd and move up with their 2nd round pick and go after Rice, Gonzales, Sears, Wright, or someone else who will not be there at pick #53.
 

Silverstar

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,945
Reaction score
3,070
Double Trouble;1472598 said:
Justin Harrell just isn't a NT. It's not just size. Look at his body type. He's a natural 4-3 tackle, or maybe you could project him to 3-4 end.

IMO, it makes no sense to try to completely change the type of player Harrell is - taking away what he does best - to justify taking him at #22.


Just look at his body type? :rolleyes:

You're the one making no sense trying to justify something.
 

Silverstar

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,945
Reaction score
3,070
InmanRoshi;1472690 said:
Have you ever watched him play or are you just reading internet draft bios? He's a 4-3 three tech who's specialty is using quickness to get into gaps.


Have you ever seen Harrell play the noseguard position before?


Didn't think so.

Since most of the DT propects in this draft, have never played the NT position in college....your point is weak at best. What you're trying to say, is that Harrell is not capable of playing the noseguard position and that's just nonsense.
 
Top