Kellen Moore Failed Dak Prescott

[Haimerej]

JeremiaH

I know about winning. I doubt you know about defense or winning in football. As I told you before, scoring more point means good. Football isn't golf.

You're repeating yourself now.

 

[Zman5]

You're repeating yourself now.

Because you seem to not get the simple concept scoring MORE points is better than LESS points.

 

[Haimerej]

Because you seem to not get the simple concept scoring MORE points is better than LESS points.

Is that why?

 

[Zman5]

Is that why?

What do you think? Do you have other questions?

 

[Captain-Crash]

dak failed the team and fans

 

[Haimerej]

What do you think? Do you have other questions?

I think you said only Dak could run the offense. When confronted with Cooper's better efficiency against common opponents you decided the amount of points would convince me. It didn't.

So here we are. Can't think of anything worth asking at the moment though. Enjoy the Super Bowl.

 

[buddahjoe445]

Because you seem to not get the simple concept scoring MORE points is better than LESS points.

what if you're the reason the other team scores more points?

 

[Zman5]

I think you said only Dak could run the offense. When confronted with Cooper's better efficiency against common opponents you decided the amount of points would convince me. It didn't.

So here we are. Can't think of anything worth asking at the moment though. Enjoy the Super Bowl.

Games under Rush 21 ppg. That would have been ranked 16th at the end of the year.
Games under Dak 30 ppg. That would have been ranked 1st at the end of the year.

Anybody with a basic football knowledge would call 30 ppg and being ranked 1st a more of a working offense than the 16th ranked offense scoring only 21 points.

 

[Zman5]

what if you're the reason the other team scores more points?

Considering we were ranked #5 in point differential, Dak must have scored plenty and not given away many points.

 

[Haimerej]

Games under Rush 21 ppg. That would have been ranked 16th at the end of the year.
Games under Dak 30 ppg. That would have been ranked 1st at the end of the year.

Anybody with a basic football knowledge would call 30 ppg and being ranked 1st a more of a working offense than the 16th ranked offense scoring only 21 points.

Games under Rush 4-1.

Games under Dak 9-5.

Anybody with a basic football knowledge would say 4-1 is a better winning % than 9-5.

 

[Zman5]

Games under Rush 4-1.

Games under Dak 9-5.

Anybody with a basic football knowledge would say 4-1 is a better winning % than 9-5.

Points per game given up by the defense with Rush 16.
Points per game given up by the defense with Dak 22.

Had defense given up 22 PPG when Rush was the QB, he would be 0-5 with that pathetic 21points per game average.
As I thought, you don't have a clue about this thing called a defense.

 

[Haimerej]

Games under Rush 21 ppg. That would have been ranked 16th at the end of the year.
Games under Dak 30 ppg. That would have been ranked 1st at the end of the year.

Anybody with a basic football knowledge would call 30 ppg and being ranked 1st a more of a working offense than the 16th ranked offense scoring only 21 points.

You assume he wouldn't have scored more if they had to. They didn't even need to do anything the 2nd half of the Rams game, for example.

But again, 4-1 is better than 9-5

 

[Zman5]

You assume he wouldn't have scored more if they had to. They didn't even need to do anything the 2nd half of the Rams game, for example.

But again, 4-1 is better than 9-5

And you assume Rush would have continued to play without more issues had he played more games. I guess you didn't watch how he played vs the Eagirls.

 

[Haimerej]

And you assume Rush would have played as well had he played more games. I guess you didn't watch how he played vs the Eagirls.

You realize you're now arguing something completely different, right?

 

[khiladi]

We wasted our prime OL training the Jason Garrett of QBs, when the NFC East was trash.

Now we are watching Hurts have all day to throw in the SB…

 

[Zman5]

You realize you're now arguing something completely different, right?

Do you realize your arguments are based on your assumption about what Rush could have done?
Just because you want to assume Rush could have played like an MVP doesn't make it true.

 

[buddahjoe445]

Considering we were ranked #5 in point differential, Dak must have scored plenty and not given away many points.

Maybe they could have been ranked higher if Dak made fewer mistakes.

I also remember Dak helping SF win the game in playoffs. I think eventually Dak will be gone and it will be an addition by subtraction scenario.

 

[Haimerej]

Do you realize your arguments are based on your assumption about what Rush could have done?
Just because you want to assume Rush could have played like an MVP doesn't make it true.

This started by you saying Dak is the only one who made Kellen's offense work. I showed Rush had better performances against 2 of 3 common opponents. Then you started saying scoring more was better. I said I liked winning. You said you're more likely to win if you score. I showed Rush has a better winning percentage.

You're trying to say I'm propping Rush when I'm touting Kellen. You're kinda all over the place. Obviously Dak is a more talented QB than Rush. But they won with Rush. Someone has to get credit and I don't see teams beating down Rush's door.

 

[Zman5]

This started by you saying Dak is the only one who made Kellen's offense work. I showed Rush had better performances against 2 of 3 common opponents. Then you started saying scoring more was better. I said I liked winning. You said you're more likely to win if you score. I showed Rush has a better winning percentage.

You're trying to say I'm propping Rush when I'm touting Kellen. You're kinda all over the place. Obviously Dak is a more talented QB than Rush. But they won with Rush. Someone has to get credit and I don't see teams beating down Rush's door.

Both Dak and Rush were 3-1 vs the common opponents with Dak scoring more points. Anyone who knows basic football will tell you Dak lead offense is much better offense. And you believing Rush was the big reason we won the games tells me you need to go google football 101 and learn the game.

 

[pitt33]

I’m not ready to go that far.


That being said this upcoming season is going to be very interesting to see how Dak performs with a new OC and play called vs how Herbert performs with Kellen.

Should be illuminating.

I’m not expecting anything from Dak that he already hasn’t shown us.