8 INTs and 20 PDs in his first 3 full NFL seasons ain't bad.bbgun;1428671 said:"Ball-hawking center fielder" does not come to mind.
theogt;1428680 said:8 INTs and 20 PDs in his first 3 full NFL seasons ain't bad.
In the first 2/3s of the season (when he made all of those those picks) he was having an absolute monster season. He led the league in turnovers for quite some time. Maybe there's some truth to the injury rumor with Roy. His play certainly tanked. Regardless, he's not nearly as bad as people claim. You knew that, though.bbgun;1428682 said:By that standard, Roy's five picks last year would make him a "roving ball-hawker."
theogt;1428689 said:In the first 2/3s of the season (when he made all of those those picks) he was having an absolute monster season. He led the league in turnovers for quite some time. Maybe there's some truth to the injury rumor with Roy. His play certainly tanked. Regardless, he's not nearly as bad as people claim. You knew that, though.
ELDudearino;1428673 said:Does anybody know of any stellar MLB's in the draft?
bbgun;1428663 said:Jack Ruby's old place.
abersonc;1428707 said:Hamlin may not be great in coverage -- but if the pass rush improves then it isn't so much a concern. And Hamlin, he can lay the lumber.
Depends on what you mean by "the answer." I'm sure he'll be infinitely better than Davis. His "stats" don't look bad, but we don't really have access to the meaningful stats.bbgun;1428697 said:Forget Roy. Is Hamlin the answer at free safety? That's my concern.
theogt;1428717 said:Depends on what you mean by "the answer." I'm sure he'll be infinitely better than Davis. His "stats" don't look bad, but we don't really have access to the meaningful stats.