Vertigo_17
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,278
- Reaction score
- 56
CATCH17;5067432 said:Kiff needs to look at age and contract situations before he claims we're ok there.
I'd be absolutely shocked if that hasn't happened already
CATCH17;5067432 said:Kiff needs to look at age and contract situations before he claims we're ok there.
CATCH17;5067432 said:Kiff needs to look at age and contract situations before he claims we're ok there.
CATCH17;5067432 said:Kiff needs to look at age and contract situations before he claims we're ok there.
TheRomoSexual;5067467 said:Haha, yeah, i'm sure Kiffin does not know the age and contract status of his players. Give me a break.
TheCount;5067456 said:He did look at the age. To him, a 30 year old is a spring chicken.
True, Kiffin doesn't know what he's talking about....fortdick;5067357 said:Can't be true, the guy in the other thread said our whole front seven is terrible and injury prone, as well as ugly. They want the big fat turd who played for their home team in college. The turd has to be the best because his cousin went to high school with him.
CowboysYanksLakers;5067359 said:D-Line should be addressed next year.
TheCount;5067318 said:I mean, what do you guys want to add other than depth?
Ware, Hatcher, Ratliff and Spencer seems pretty good to me. Crawford, Lissemore and Wilbur seem like reasonable depth even though I'm not sold on any of them as a pass rusher.
I do want us to add some help on the pass rush, but it seems like we already have 4 starters up front.
Considering I always felt Ratliff was out of place at NT, I'm actually excited to see how he does at DT.
theranchsucks;5067672 said:Wilber is way too small.
scottsp;5067770 said:Ok, so I have not taken a look at 32 clubs' defensive depth charts, but is ours the smallest front four in the NFL?
theogt;5067327 said:I wish they'd just draft some 370 lb. sack of turds, so people would shut up about a "big man in the middle."
TheCount;5067318 said:I mean, what do you guys want to add other than depth?
Ware, Hatcher, Ratliff and Spencer seems pretty good to me. Crawford, Lissemore and Wilbur seem like reasonable depth even though I'm not sold on any of them as a pass rusher.
I do want us to add some help on the pass rush, but it seems like we already have 4 starters up front.
Considering I always felt Ratliff was out of place at NT, I'm actually excited to see how he does at DT.
NinePointOh;5067797 said:It's not really fair to ask that now, because our guys should be adding about 5-15 pounds as they transition from LB to DE. Their 2012 weight (which is all you'll find right now) would be significantly lower their 2013 weight (which is what they'll actually play their new positions at).
After they bulk up, no, they'll be on the smaller side of 4-3 teams but not the smallest.
scottsp;5067822 said:I can make the same case with a number of clubs. Many can get bigger. The larger lines can bulk up, and so on. The question is, as of now, where do we rank in comparison?
Then again, this is prolly something we should verify independently.
fortdick;5067357 said:Can't be true, the guy in the other thread said our whole front seven is terrible and injury prone, as well as ugly. They want the big fat turd who played for their home team in college. The turd has to be the best because his cousin went to high school with him.
TheCount;5067318 said:I mean, what do you guys want to add other than depth?
Ware, Hatcher, Ratliff and Spencer seems pretty good to me. Crawford, Lissemore and Wilbur seem like reasonable depth even though I'm not sold on any of them as a pass rusher.
I do want us to add some help on the pass rush, but it seems like we already have 4 starters up front.
Considering I always felt Ratliff was out of place at NT, I'm actually excited to see how he does at DT.