Lance Dunbar - Emphatic praise from Garrett, Brown, Witten

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I've noticed that Garrett and RB coach Brown have made emphatic statements recently about Lance Dunbar being a terrific player.

Normally when coaches make such emphatic statements it is in response to something. Garrett made emphatic statements about Murray after last season because he wanted him to be re-signed.

I'm curious is it's just media prompting that has caused Garrett and Brown to make these emphatic statements OR if there is some internal debate where the coaches really want to retain Dunbar but are concerned that the front office will cut him.

From Brown:
“I envision [him getting more opportunities],” Cowboys running backs coach Gary Brown recently said. “I think he’s a hell of a football player, we’ve got to try and get him more involved and I think [offensive coordinator Scott Linehan] is going to do a great job doing that.”


Question: Dunbar was third on the team in rushing last season with 99 yards on 29 attempts. So why wasn’t he more involved?


“Because I think the run game was so explosive and DeMarco was running so well,” Brown said. “It’s just like anything in life, you’ve got a guy who is hot, you want to ride that guy and make sure he gets his touches and I think we did the right thing by getting him his touches. Obviously with, what was it, 1,800 yards and 13, 14 touchdowns, whatever it was, I think we made the right decision.”



Garrett made some emphatic comments about Dunbar a during one of the OTA press conferences. That was on video so I don't have the quote, but it was emphatic and I think he might have used the "He's a hell of a football player" statement which he used in regards to Murray before free agency.

From Garrett (not the press conference statement):
Earlier this year, Cowboys coach Jason Garrett called Dunbar “someone who has always been productive with every opportunity we’ve given him. He’s a smaller back but very explosive and sturdier than most people think.”

Even Witten got in on the praise:
“We’ve always liked Lance a lot,” tight end Jason Witten said. “Lance has got some quickness, he’s a mismatch in the run game on the edge with his speed, but especially in the pass game. He’s got really good feel. He can step up in there and protect. He just continues to get better and better.”
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
They've been saying for years that they want to get Dunbar more involved. And then they just can't seem to get him on the field. I read those comments as the team tipping their hand a bit about the plans for the RB position this coming season. If Dunbar's on the roster, they're indicating they're finally going to commit to getting him in the game more regularly in packages where they couldn't justify getting Murray off the field last year. In which case, it's a decent indication of which other snaps they're looking to fill from the other three backs on the roster.

As long as we've got Dunbar's rights, I can't believe the coaches would be concerned about losing him if they want to keep him. That's the kind of thing a dysfunctional organization would do, but that hasn't been our MO under Garrett.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
They've been saying for years that they want to get Dunbar more involved. And then they just can't seem to get him on the field. I read those comments as the team tipping their hand a bit about the plans for the RB position this coming season. If Dunbar's on the roster, they're indicating they're finally going to commit to getting him in the game more regularly in packages where they couldn't justify getting Murray off the field last year. In which case, it's a decent indication of which other snaps they're looking to fill from the other three backs on the roster.

As long as we've got Dunbar's rights, I can't believe the coaches would be concerned about losing him if they want to keep him. That's the kind of thing a dysfunctional organization would do, but that hasn't been our MO under Garrett.

The coaches including Garrett would have paid Murray if it was their choice, IMO. It is best to have a GM that is not the Head Coach because of issues like the decision not to re-sign Murray. It is easier for a GM to make non-emotional decisions than it is for a Head Coach in regards to players.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
The coaches including Garrett would have paid Murray if it was their choice, IMO. It is best to have a GM that is not the Head Coach because of issues like the decision not to re-sign Murray. It is easier for a GM to make non-emotional decisions than it is for a Head Coach in regards to players.

Opponents knew what they were getting with last year's offense and ground game -- they just had a difficult time stopping it.

The RB by committee approach has advantages in its variables, flexibility, and complexity for defensive preparation.

Dunbar may get his looks this year.
 

Outlaw Heroes

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,401
Reaction score
6,609
I wonder if the coaches aren't communicating to Dunbar through the media. There has to have been concern on his end that McFadden's signing makes him expendable inasmuch as McFadden is as potentially explosive in the pass game but offers superior pass pro in 3rd down situations. This may be the coaching staff's way of assuring him (publicly, and therefore more credibly) that they still see a role for him on this team if he competes well in training camp.
 

JBell

That's still my Quarterback
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
6,840
Because when he is on the field teams just worry about the edge or the screen.

Lol it became pretty laughable when Dunbar would enter the game.

You knew it'd be a screen. Hopefully they correct that, like when "kill, kill" always used to mean a run.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The coaches including Garrett would have paid Murray if it was their choice, IMO. It is best to have a GM that is not the Head Coach because of issues like the decision not to re-sign Murray. It is easier for a GM to make non-emotional decisions than it is for a Head Coach in regards to players.

Murray was an UFA, though, who was OPotY. That's an important distinction. Lobbying for a blockbuster signing that pays age and a high number of carries is different from arguing for a roster spot for a player you have on the roster already. I can't believe there's any player on the roster this summer who doesn't stay if Jason Garrett and his position coach don't want him.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
Hopefully they correct that, like when "kill, kill" always used to mean a run.

Ugh. I still cringe thinking about that. They were literally telling the defense, "crap. we were going to pass, but uh... yeahhhh. we're running now."
 

cowboyblue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
8,707
they have said all this before and it never comes to anything will believe it when I see it show me
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I thought they overused Murray last year. There were times when defenses were gassed and a guy like Dunbar could have really taken advantage. Yet, they kept pounding Murray in there, and wore him out.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
Doesnt matter to me, hes here, hes gone, i see nothing more special than any other RB. we hear this every year with other rbs and we are sooooo wowed by average. Lets just see what happens. Whats the worst that happens, he contributes?
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
Every year its the same inten, get Dunbar more touches but he is completely forgotten ad the year goes on.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,985
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I thought they overused Murray last year. There were times when defenses were gassed and a guy like Dunbar could have really taken advantage. Yet, they kept pounding Murray in there, and wore him out.
That would be a logical assumption if everyone considered the odds of Murray sticking around in 2015 weren't reasonable. Perhaps they ran Murray too much to maximize his productivity before he was completely unavailable. I believe this is true. If so, I can see Dunbar's rushing opportunities increasing this season as he is thrown into the new running back rotation.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,782
Reaction score
16,658
I thought they overused Murray last year. There were times when defenses were gassed and a guy like Dunbar could have really taken advantage. Yet, they kept pounding Murray in there, and wore him out.

yeah they could have wore them down with murray then put the faster fresh dunbar or randle in and give them more carries.
 
Top