Tuna Helper
Benched
- Messages
- 2,049
- Reaction score
- 0
KD said:Loser is in a HUGE HOLE.
WE MUST WIN.
Well said!
KD said:Loser is in a HUGE HOLE.
WE MUST WIN.
skinsngibbs4life said:that was against a heavy rush, the skins showed ZERO of that last night. If we dont get pressure on him, he should be able to have a field.
(By the way, I just think how funny it is that we are all trying to prove how our own team is worse than the other, and that they are going to do worse on sunday:laugh1: )
skinsngibbs4life said:(By the way, I just think how funny it is that we are all trying to prove how our own team is worse than the other, and that they are going to do worse on sunday:laugh1: )
Gfunk said:the only thing that worries me about Dallas is your home field advantage and Terry Glenn vs. our #2 (and lower) corners
should be another classic, neither team wants to go 0-2
Yakuza Rich said:I kind of feel that Saunders exposed a lot of his gameplan and playbook against the Vikings and the Vikings made good adjustments and Saunders didn't have any answer for that. I also felt that the good news for Skins fans was that early on the schemes and play designs were gaining yardage and points for the Skins. Unfortunately, they needed those schemes and play designs because the execution was rather poor.
I couldn't disagree more. Minnesota almost killed themselves last night by not passing more. They could have and should have passed much more. Even though they won, they got a little lucky due to Washington's stunning innefectiveness in the deep red zone.Tuna Helper said:For the Cowboys on Offense:
I would minimize the number pass attempts for Bledsoe down to 20. It sounds low, but I think it is achievable. I would take a page out of Minny's book and pound the ball with JJ and MBIII early in the game, even if we get only 2 yards a carry early on. Minny had bigger holes to run through as the game wore on. TO will have double coverage, likely with Rogers and Taylor covering him. Glenn will be single covered, likely by Mike Rumph. Witten will be matched up against a safety. Proileau is likely out for the season, so the Skins are thin at Safety.
The way I see it, the passing game and TO should only be used to keep the Commanders from putting 8 men in the box. They cannot afford to put 8 men in with both Glenn and TO as wideouts. This should spell success for the running game if the O-line can figure out how to block. TO WILL NOT have a monster day, but Glenn and Witten should see most of the passes coming their way. The key is efficient, time consuming drives that focus on taking advantage of a double-covered TO with the running game. If they single cover TO, and choose to stop the running game, then I would focus on completing short passes to TO. Overall, I see a very conservative game plan that protects Drew Bledsoe and his reportedly ailing back. If any of this works, then Parcells must stick with it until the Commanders prove they can stop it. This regime has a history of moving away from things that work.
NIBGoldenchild said:I disagree completely on this point. The playcalling as well as formations looked almost as if we didn't have a new guy calling the plays at all. I expected more. The formation that looked new was "trips left", but that was rarely used. I came away from the game thinking Saunders doesn't feel the players are comfortable enough in the offense to really open it up yet.
sandtrapp said:I can't beleive the civility that I'm reading between the skins fans and the boys fans here.
Don't get me wrong ,it's refreshing to see intelligent conversations and disagreements, but surprising.
I'll tell you one thing tho, I won't be a part of it with the Beagles.:iggles:
That is because you are on CowboysZone and not Extremeskins.sandtrapp said:I can't beleive the civility that I'm reading between the skins fans and the boys fans here.
Don't get me wrong ,it's refreshing to see intelligent conversations and disagreements, but surprising.
I'll tell you one thing tho, I won't be a part of it with the Beagles.:iggles:
How much do you guys have left? 96%?jrockster77 said:Yeah...not sure how you could look at that game and say "Wow, Saunders really opened up the playbook." There were no trick plays, very few deep balls, and almost no passes thrown to Cooley. There is still a lot left in that playbook...
jrockster77 said:Yeah...not sure how you could look at that game and say "Wow, Saunders really opened up the playbook." There were no trick plays, very few deep balls, and almost no passes thrown to Cooley. There is still a lot left in that playbook...
jrockster77 said:Yeah...not sure how you could look at that game and say "Wow, Saunders really opened up the playbook." There were no trick plays, very few deep balls, and almost no passes thrown to Cooley. There is still a lot left in that playbook...
Smith22 said:I'm with DW, if we want to win this game, attack the skins weakness. The skins secondary is really hurting and couldn't cover the Vikings WR's, so there is no reason why a HEALTHY Bledsoe can't rack up some big plays with TO, Glenn and Witten.