SkinsandTerps
Commanders Forever
- Messages
- 7,627
- Reaction score
- 125
Yakuza Rich said:Dallas is going to have to not be afraid to blitz. Problem is that Washington's offense revolves on running plays on the perimeter and Dallas' defense isn't exactly fast so Parcells and Zimmer may be averse to blitzing in fear of getting burned on the outside. Still, Minny's defense is probably slower than Dallas' and they blitzed more than we did in the Jacksonville game and it worked reasonably well....and they had a rookie nickel CB and rookie FS starting for them.
Bledsoe was upright and the receivers were open in the Jacksonville game, but he was off on his throws and making bad reads. If we get the same pass protection and open receivers and Bledsoe makes the throws, we are in good shape. If he plays like he did Sunday, it's going to be a long year.
I kind of feel that Saunders exposed a lot of his gameplan and playbook against the Vikings and the Vikings made good adjustments and Saunders didn't have any answer for that. I also felt that the good news for Skins fans was that early on the schemes and play designs were gaining yardage and points for the Skins. Unfortunately, they needed those schemes and play designs because the execution was rather poor.
I could honestly see this game turning out in multiple ways....barn burner, blowout Dallas, blowout Washington, defensive struggle, etc.
YAKUZA
Come on Rich, This post is not up to your typical standards.
1. Does the offense really revolve on outside running plays ? All of the Commanders RBs are very capable of taking it up the middle, unlike the guys in KC.
2. Did the Commanders offense play 700 pages worth of plays ? Come on.
3. Unfortunately the Commanders offense sputtered in the Red Zone time and time again (so I agree that execution was a problem in those situations). Otherwise they Commanders played fairly well on offense.
The Commanders on ST were average. STs really concerns me.