News: Like it or not, the Cowboys go as Tony Romo goes

[Super_Kazuya]

I root for whichever qb is playing. But yeah, that was a fail lol.

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/cowboys-jaguars-game-thread-1st-half.305831/page-48#post-5793915
There is your positive romo post. Since you asked. Now go play in the corner. Like I said I don't have the time to go in circles with an idiot. I'm sure they make medication for your problems. You don't have to take it out on ppl over the Internet lol. Talk football or don't reply to my posts, clown.

Whoa... like finding a unicorn. Now here is one of your many overreactions from Week 1:

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/cowboys-vs-49ers-1st-half-game-thread.298643/page-67#post-5664433

Now there's a million posts like this from you, and maybe 1 or 2 of the ones you posted. Please stop embarrassing yourself... anyone can see all of anyone else's posts on here. You're a card carrying Romo hater and have been for a long time. You don't get to pretend otherwise. Now go crawl back under your rock and wait for the next bad game, like you and your ilk are best known for.

 

[JoeKing]

Jesus, dude. Why is this so hard to comprehend? Sanchez and Stanton are serviceable QBs, Weeden has no business being in the league, none. QBs can rarely win games by themselves, but they sure as heck can lose games by themselves. Weeden singlehandedly lost the Arizona game, make no mistake about it.

That means Romo singlehandedly lost the Washington game. That of course is an unfair statement, just as unfair as yours about Weeden... make no mistake about that.

 

[TrailBlazer]

Whoa... like finding a unicorn. Now here is one of your many overreactions from Week 1:

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/cowboys-vs-49ers-1st-half-game-thread.298643/page-67#post-5664433

Now there's a million posts like this from you, and maybe 1 or 2 of the ones you posted. Please stop embarrassing yourself... anyone can see all of anyone else's posts on here. You're a card carrying Romo hater and have been for a long time. You don't get to pretend otherwise. Now go crawl back under your rock and wait for the next bad game, like you and your ilk are best known for.

nice job. You had to go deep in my post history for that.

I call it how I see it. It's called being objective. If Romo plays well I'll let you know, and if he plays bad I'll let you know that too.

If you're offended by that, then you're in the wrong place. This is a place with ppl with alternate viewpoints.

If you get your kicks acting tough on the internet, then you have some issues. You wouldnt keep replying to my posts unless you enjoyed going in circles with me. Which is flattering, i guess. But it leads me to believe you are a tad looney. Try to bring something constructive to the board. Not just chiming in to run your mouth. We all would appreciate it. Now please excuse me from this exercise in futility, I don't have as much time on my hands as you probably do.

 

[Super_Kazuya]

If Romo plays well I'll let you know

Please stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[pastordug]

I partially agree with Hill on this. They're going nowhere without Romo.

Why? Because we have NO BACK UP QB.........and this is more problematic now than ever before given Romo's health and age. Getting someone to play backup is not easy either. QB's have very high EGO'S and don't like being second fiddle. I agree with those who say we had better begin looking for a replacement who could learn under Romo while he is still playing. But who?

 

[SuspectCorner]

if the green bay packers have to go to the backup QB for any stretch - they are D-O-N-E. i like the chances for this years Dallas Cowboys. they should make the playoffs... and, as our division mates the Giants have shown us twice in the last several years, from there out - it is all about who is the 'hottest team.'