LMAO we were worth a thread at ES

skins are our signature rivals. dallas wouldn't be dallas without their counterpart/nemeses washington. it's kinda like how the yankees and bosox rivalry helps define BOTH those teams.

when the Commanders fans are down on a player for something he did to a Cowboy - you know dayum well that player musta REALLY crossed "the line". they're Commanders fans. they me be biased (as are most Cowboys fans) but, as the "extremeskins" thread on the subject illustrates, they are neither blind nor stupid.

i think the "haynesworth-gurode incident" will sicken just about any fan of sports.
 
tothewhipbill;1064425 said:
skins are our signature rivals. dallas wouldn't be dallas without their counterpart/nemeses washington. it's kinda like how the yankees and bosox rivalry helps define BOTH those teams.

when the Commanders fans are down on a player for something he did to a Cowboy - you know dayum well that player musta REALLY crossed "the line". they're Commanders fans. they me be biased (as are most Cowboys fans) but, as the "extremeskins" thread on the subject illustrates, they are neither blind nor stupid.

i think the "haynesworth-gurode incident" will sicken just about any fan of sports.

I hear ya.... but disagree on Yankees-Boston... Yankees-Boston defines Boston ONLY.... Yankees are not defined by Boston by any means...
 
YoMick;1064434 said:
I hear ya.... but disagree on Yankees-Boston... Yankees-Boston defines Boston ONLY.... Yankees are not defined by Boston by any means...

overcoming obstacles/rivals is what builds a franchises legend and mystique.

the yankees are historically linked to the redsox and prolly dodgers.

the celtics are linked to the lakers.

bears are linked with the packers.

cowboys are linked with the Commanders.

it's not my opinion. it's a fact.
 
BigDFan5;1064391 said:
I made my reply

http://i55.***BLOCKED***/albums/g152/BigDFan5/814422-R1-03-2A.jpg
Quite literally...scoreboard.
 
tothewhipbill;1064468 said:
overcoming obstacles/rivals is what builds a franchises legend and mystique.

the yankees are historically linked to the redsox and prolly dodgers.

the celtics are linked to the lakers.

bears are linked with the packers.

cowboys are linked with the Commanders.

it's not my opinion. it's a fact.

Sorry. No. Yankees are not defined by Boston.

You have NO facts that support Yankees are defined by Boston. None.

Boston was a non factor for many of their 26 WS.

But I digress.... if it is of your opinion that Boston defines Yankees... thats ok with me.

Furthermore... the Cowboys are NOT defined by Washington...
 
man i got banned from ES in about an 30 mins, send a big :skins::dissskin: to that forum and organization and fans and everyone watching there games
 
YoMick;1064482 said:
Sorry. No. Yankees are not defined by Boston.

You have NO facts that support Yankees are defined by Boston. None.

Boston was a non factor for many of their 26 WS.

But I digress.... if it is of your opinion that Boston defines Yankees... thats ok with me.

Furthermore... the Cowboys are NOT defined by Washington...

let's not quibble over semantics. you'll note i used the terms "help define" in my original post. maybe it all comes down to our individual interpretation of the word "define".

by the way - i haaaaaate the stinkin' yankees. ta-ta.
 
YoMick;1064482 said:
Sorry. No. Yankees are not defined by Boston.

You have NO facts that support Yankees are defined by Boston. None.

Boston was a non factor for many of their 26 WS.

But I digress.... if it is of your opinion that Boston defines Yankees... thats ok with me.

Furthermore... the Cowboys are NOT defined by Washington...

Sounds like someones a Yankees fan :D

And I agree with the bolded part.
 
foreskin fans are ignorant in general, and ES has the most ignorant of the all the ignorant. it's not just the homers, they have the most lame topics of any message board. one recently was "i bet sean taylor could beat up joey porter".
way too many punk teenagers and washed up billy kilmer fans there.
 
skins are our signature rivals. dallas wouldn't be dallas without their counterpart/nemeses washington. it's kinda like how the yankees and bosox rivalry helps define BOTH those teams..

That gets into the question, can the hammer have a rivalry with the nail?
 
30yrheel;1064622 said:
foreskin fans are ignorant in general, and ES has the most ignorant of the all the ignorant. it's not just the homers, they have the most lame topics of any message board. one recently was "i bet sean taylor could beat up joey porter".
way too many punk teenagers and washed up billy kilmer fans there.

Same could be said about any message board.

And to call every skins fan in the country ignorant is ignorant and disrespectful itself, and you should be ashamed to make a comment like that, that contradicts itself.

Makes me think your one of those punk teenages, or a washed up Roger Staubach fan...............
 
SkinsFan07;1065653 said:
Same could be said about any message board.

And to call every skins fan in the country ignorant is ignorant and disrespectful itself, and you should be ashamed to make a comment like that, that contradicts itself.

Makes me think your one of those punk teenages, or a washed up Roger Staubach fan...............

Yeah seriously that is a personal thought, I mean I could say the same thing about Cowboys fans too, yesterday when I said, "Don't give me that bull" everyone started getting all offended and upset, over something like that, but you all forgot to notice I had posted here bc of concern of your player's health. All the guys at my forum, pretty much think Dallas fans are stupid too, not that I take that opinion. Personally I think all fan bases have stupid fans that talk smack and dont know ****, but to generalize is very immature.

That being said, I do agree with you to a certain extend about ES, there are ALOT of members at that site, and it is officially linked to Commanders.com, so a whole bunch of tools join that site. thewarpath.net, is my home, and on the whole there are less stupid fans. Are there fans that say dumb stuff? Alot of rookies at our site think the Boys fans are hicks, trash, etc, but again that is beyond ignorant, as it is to assume Skins fans are stupid, without any real evidence. It is almost juvenile(sp) as well IMO. Of course, but as in any other site. Your site has dumb fans too, as does mine, just admit it.

It is very easy to make claims like that, but to actually validate it, while holding up to counterpoints, is a whole different story. I can start showing you posts of Boys fans that started crap at our site, and Boys fans that I think are stupid, but at the same time I can also show you posts of smart Boys fan who are respectful.

Don't take the easy road out.
 
MarionBarberThe4th;1064260 said:
We won 27 to 10, when it very easily could of been 27-3 or 27-0 if not for 30 yards gift wrapped from the officials and we really didnt play very well.

They very well could beat us, but thats not the kind of team I worry about weeks in advance. The Colts are.....

Not to stir up anything, but do the Commanders look like the same team now as 2 weeks ago? Come on, now.
 
MossBurner;1068268 said:
Not to stir up anything, but do the Commanders look like the same team now as 2 weeks ago? Come on, now.

yes ..... they still need the refs to bail them out.
 
zrinkill;1068546 said:
yes ..... they still need the refs to bail them out.


Your schtick is getting old, if we went 16-0 you would still say we suck. Not that I care, your opinion doesn't change reality or the outcome of the games. So you can continue to live in whatever deluded reality you've created in your mind, have fun.
 
NIBGoldenchild;1068655 said:
continue to live in whatever deluded reality you've created in your mind, have fun.

We beat you 27-10 ..... your O scored 3 points when we gave you 30 yards ......

who is living in a fantasy world again? who is last place in the division?

:lmao2:
 
zrinkill;1068772 said:
We beat you 27-10 ..... your O scored 3 points when we gave you 30 yards ......

who is living in a fantasy world again? who is last place in the division?

:lmao2:

Last place? Um, the Giants. Wow. The fact that you didn't even know that pretty much sums up how sad you are on this board. Good day. :D
 
The Giants have had their bye week kid and you have not ........ you have lost the same amount of games and the Giants next opponent are the wimps of the NFL.

opps ........ sorry

:lmao:
 
zrinkill;1069606 said:
The Giants have had their bye week kid and you have not ........ you have lost the same amount of games and the Giants next opponent are the wimps of the NFL.

opps ........ sorry

:lmao:

Too bad the Giants are 3-13 since 1993 after the bye week. Good luck with them beating us. The only way they will beat us is if the buy the entire Chicago Bears defense for Sunday, because other than that our Offense will blow them out of their own stadium. If they somehow come up with enough emotion (i.e owner last year) to power us out of the stadium like they did last year, they might have a chance, otherwise, you shouldn't bother watching the massacre that is gonna be unleashed on those wannabees come Sunday.


Also, those "wimps" of the NFL beat a team that you didn't and have the #3 offense in the NFL after shredding the former #3 defense that the Jags had for 481 yards and had an 100 yd rusher (1st time the jags had allowed an 100 yd rusher in 12 games). The best team you played was the Jags and you lost to them, because we weren't good, nor healthy when you whooped us in week 2. Once you beat a team above .500 (i.e. Eagles) then you can explain why you are so good. But once you lose to the Eagles, and we beat the Giants, you'll be fighting for words to explain why you are the wimps of the NFL.

oops sorry :lmao: :lmao2: :laugh2: :laugh1: :D :) :cool:
 
SkinsFan07;1069737 said:
Too bad the Giants are 3-13 since 1993 after the bye week. Good luck with them beating us. The only way they will beat us is if the buy the entire Chicago Bears defense for Sunday, because other than that our Offense will blow them out of their own stadium. If they somehow come up with enough emotion (i.e owner last year) to power us out of the stadium like they did last year, they might have a chance, otherwise, you shouldn't bother watching the massacre that is gonna be unleashed on those wannabees come Sunday.


Also, those "wimps" of the NFL beat a team that you didn't and have the #3 offense in the NFL after shredding the former #3 defense that the Jags had for 481 yards and had an 100 yd rusher (1st time the jags had allowed an 100 yd rusher in 12 games). The best team you played was the Jags and you lost to them, because we weren't good, nor healthy when you whooped us in week 2. Once you beat a team above .500 (i.e. Eagles) then you can explain why you are so good. But once you lose to the Eagles, and we beat the Giants, you'll be fighting for words to explain why you are the wimps of the NFL.

oops sorry :lmao: :lmao2: :laugh2: :laugh1: :D :) :cool:

Please go make me a cup of coffee or do the laundry or something. Make all the excuses you want, but the fact of the matter is we owned you punks and will own you again and again. How many games have the Commanders won in, let's say, .........oh........ the last 20 against the Cowboys? And in those games that the Foreskins have won in the last 20 how many were dominant. I count one (last year). You've beaten the worst team in the league and had a good week at home last week. And, all of a sudden you're the real deal? "Shut up make me turkey pot pie."

SS


:star:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
463,990
Messages
13,782,098
Members
23,770
Latest member
AnthonyDavis
Back
Top