Logan Wilson?

He’s pretty old now and has lost at least one step. He also can’t cover well, at all.

I wouldn’t trade for him. Especially not in a year when we will likely be below .500
 
You got your wish, big upgrade over whoever we were fielding.
 
He’s pretty old now and has lost at least one step. He also can’t cover well, at all.

I wouldn’t trade for him. Especially not in a year when we will likely be below .500
Respect you bro, but your reconaissance drones failed to deliver you the goods on Wilson. He's a very good cover LB. And the price was almost nothing.

Hawkeye dominated this thread.
 
Respect you bro, but your reconaissance drones failed to deliver you the goods on Wilson. He's a very good cover LB. And the price was almost nothing.
Several bengals fans have been commenting through the season that while once was a good cover LB, he had struggled with it this year and that was one of the reasons he was benched.

I could have not gathered enough recon, but is it possible you’re tapping into old data?
 
I'm getting old, Kwyn. Many things are possible, especially when I'm posting after a few drinks, past my expiration hour.

While I like to merge PFF scores and data over the most recent two seasons for more balanced evaluation...When I double-check my data on Wilson I see that perhaps he's not as good in coverage as I'd reported a moment ago. In truth: this time I was winging it, w/out my data.

You get a partial win, this time. Relish it while you can as we shall meet again soon, sabers in hand. ;)
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,658
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top