Kevinicus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,951
- Reaction score
- 12,730
Nah, there is still a nice air gap between the two when the arm goes back.I disagree. It looks to me like the DB's shoulder pushed Brown before Brown's arm came around his back.
Nah, there is still a nice air gap between the two when the arm goes back.I disagree. It looks to me like the DB's shoulder pushed Brown before Brown's arm came around his back.
I've just rewound and watched 4 times. I'll retract my statement about the arm not coming around the back until after contact, but he didn't actually put his arm ON him until the shoulder pushed him. It looked to me like he was trying to keep from falling down. I still think PI.I'm watching it now, and that's false.
I watch the replay pretty much every time I post, for the sake of accuracy.
There's another view that shows an angle from farther to the right than the second one here. It shows the moment the shoulder pushes into him.Here's both videos I made. I report. You decide. Now you KNOW I'm not biased with that tagline.
It doesn't seem super ridiculous to me that if he decides he's not going to be able to make a catch, the receiver's next-best strategy is to try to draw the DPI.I like how people think a wide receiver
Is gonna pull
Someone into them while attempting to catch a pass. That’d be a neat trick
They’re competitors they want that ball. They could be trying to keep their balance but they aren’t performing some elaborate maneuver.It doesn't seem super ridiculous to me that if he decides he's not going to be able to make a catch, the receiver's next-best strategy is to try to draw the DPI.
(In this case I agree with the OP and disagree with the announcers, but the contrary position is not impossible.)
Was pulled into the receiver you mean?
200% inaccurate100% inaccurate.
Yes, when the ball is in play and CB makes play for the ball. If he doesn't then there can't be contact. Ala Gallup getting bumped and falling because CB was next to him looking at QB and had equal chance at the ball.... if they are not looking back trying to make a play at the ball there can't be contactThere can be contact.
The "NO contact" thing is not the rule.
There can be contact, such as a hand on the back to feel where the receiver is, as long as that contact doesn't impede the receiver's path to the ball...which it did here, IMO.Yes, when the ball is in play and CB makes play for the ball. If he doesn't then there can't be contact. Ala Gallup getting bumped and falling because CB was next to him looking at QB and had equal chance at the ball.... if they are not looking back trying to make a play at the ball there can't be contact
PI no question. This kind of play has happened against the Cowboys CBs before. CB has to turn towards the ball to not get called for PI.Here's both videos I made. I report. You decide. Now you KNOW I'm not biased with that tagline.
I thought it was a smart play by brown lolIt was OPI if it was anything. Dallas was definitely gifted one there.
There's another view that shows an angle from farther to the right than the second one here. It shows the moment the shoulder pushes into him.
That's the one. Okay, watching it on a loop, it kinda does look like he pulled him in. Brown should've just stopped and let him run into him and it would've been easy PI. I have to reverse my stance the way it looks though. I don't know if OPI can be called when the defender isn't going for the ball, but no flag should've been thrown................Oh well. lolThis one?
Umm, what do you call this?
Those of you
Those of you claiming this was not DPI, do you remember this play?
LOL.That's the one. Okay, watching it on a loop, it kinda does look like he pulled him in. Brown should've just stopped and let him run into him and it would've been easy PI. I have to reverse my stance the way it looks though. I don't know if OPI can be called when the defender isn't going for the ball, but no flag should've been thrown................Oh well. lol
@Kevinicus , you win.
While I see your point, and have come to agree that the play in question shouldn't have been called DPI, this looks a bit more blatant on the part of the receiver, if one was to just by a still photo.Those of you
Those of you claiming this was not DPI, do you remember this play?