burmafrd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,820
- Reaction score
- 3,379
You need to take Mr T's advice. LOL
sometimes the oblivious ones miss when people are laughing AT THEM.
You need to take Mr T's advice. LOL
That's what's happening, yes. We're taking a team whose playoff sample is too small, and comparing it with playoff teams. What it lacks in validity it makes up for in convenience.Because Romo's playoff resume is so small and he hasn't led the Cowboys to the playoffs in 4 years we're forced to add season finale elimination games to his playoff record to increase his sample size.
I know you are making a great effort KJJ. But you still cannot beat out UFCRULES for being the #1 romo hater on this board. He locked up the trophy a long time ago.
That's what's happening, yes. We're taking a team whose playoff sample is too small, and comparing it with playoff teams. What it lacks in validity it makes up for in convenience.
One FAN claims the stats show there's isn't any stigma with Romo and another FAN is trying to spin that Staubach was a choker based off 5 of his 17 playoff games. No one is getting a bigger laugh than me. LOL
And most of the reason it even exists.Romo is part of the reason his elimination game record is so small.
The problem I see here is that you see things in black and white when there are multiple shades of gray, such as the fact that I obviously was not being serious about Staubach being a choker. I was simply trying to show you the fallacy of taking a small sample size of something such as "final elimination" games and applying it to someone's career. It's an arbitrary choice that only tells the story the person picking wants it to tell.
But carry on making fun of FANs who can see clearly while you continue to be struck by Romo blindness.
You were giving a biased anti-KJJ opinion of what you think transpired. If you look through this thread at some of the crap/hate that's being posted you would think I stole a few posters wives and girlfriends. LOL
And most of the reason it even exists.
That's your biased opinion now is it? And seriously, stop playing the martyr card. Nobody is being mean to you.
Not to the same degree it isn't.That's true for any team that has a solid QB.
Not to the same degree it isn't.
sometimes the oblivious ones miss when people are laughing AT THEM.
It depends on the team. Before Peyton Manning arrived in Denver they were an 8-8 team. Luck turned a 2-14 Colts team into a back to back 11-5 playoff team. Romo means a lot to the Cowboys but he was 1-5 in 2010 and Kitna was 5-3. I'll duck now. LOL
Peyton and Romo are the ones who have carried their teams, and no one else comes close in this millinium.
Kitna was 1-5 here when he wasn't provided with 3+ takeaways in the game.
Take Romo out of the equation and what's our record?How far has Romo carried the Cowboys the past 4 years?
No one is being mean to me? Haha! My PM box is full. LOL I got one word for a couple of guys here….counseling!
Take Romo out of the equation and what's our record?
I'm still laughing at that FAN who said the stats don't say there's a stigma with Romo. LOL That shows just how misleading all these stats are and how FANS buy into them.