Recommended Loss Forensics: Romo vs. the League's Top QB

[DanteEXT]

That's just more of your anger and frustration. Using the word FAN isn't name calling or I would have received a PM in my box long ago notifying me to knock it off. The word isn't used to denigrate others it's to distinguish between the homers and the realists. Some of your language has had to be hidden by a censor. I get called hater/troll both words are disparaging. None of the abuse I take from FANS is going to stop me from giving honest, unbiased opinions on the team and Romo. If my opinions bother some of you that much and don't think I have a clue what I'm talking about then put me on ignore.

LOL ... again, believe whatever fills your bank my friend. If it helps you sleep at night.

You are not distinguishing the difference, you are calling someone a homer. It's plain and simple. And you're using it as a put down, an attempt to disparage those who do not agree with you. Using homer, hater, troll are all borderline around here Mr. Martyr.

I don't put anyone on ignore. Where's the entertainment in that? How the heck am I going to laugh if I put all the comedians on ignore?

 

[CCBoy]

Just as long as that isn't the Catholic Bank, under scrutiny.

 

[KJJ]

LOL ... again, believe whatever fills your bank my friend. If it helps you sleep at night.

You are not distinguishing the difference, you are calling someone a homer. It's plain and simple. And you're using it as a put down, an attempt to disparage those who do not agree with you. Using homer, hater, troll are all borderline around here Mr. Martyr.

I don't put anyone on ignore. Where's the entertainment in that? How the heck am I going to laugh if I put all the comedians on ignore?

I've seen enough posts from you and others to know what I'm saying is fact. I'm seeing some anger and a lot of frustration simply over football opinions. Some of you need to chill. lol There's at least a couple of dudes in here who need a sit-down with Dr Phil. You're just playing a game of follow the leader repeating everything you hear others say. You're part of this frustrated alliance that can't deal with differing opinions. You're getting personal and if you continue you'll be off my discussion list. This is the last time I'm repeating that so keep it civil and on topic or they'll be no further discussions between us. If the board wasn't moderated this would be fun.

 

[5Stars]

I've seen enough posts from you and others to know what I'm saying is fact. I'm seeing some anger and a lot of frustration simply over football opinions. Some of you need to chill. lol There's at least a couple of dudes in here who need a sit-down with Dr Phil. You're just playing a game of follow the leader repeating everything you hear others say. You're part of this frustrated alliance that can't deal with differing opinions. You're getting personal and if you continue you'll be off my discussion list. This is the last time I'm repeating that so keep it civil and on topic or they'll be no further discussions between us. If the board wasn't moderated this would be fun.

lmao...yeah, who is frustrated? You have sent me filthy language related messages, dirty pictures of dog crap saying that must be what my sister looks like, that I must be a pedophile and other dirty stuff in PM's to me. That is what is called "fun" to you, troll!

That is frustration on your part.

You claim in a PM that you come here to win arguments and all I can say is that this thread will continue until YOU get the last post or it gets closed. Carry on...

 

[DanteEXT]

I've seen enough posts from you and others to know what I'm saying is fact. I'm seeing some anger and a lot of frustration simply over football opinions. Some of you need to chill. lol There's at least a couple of dudes in here who need a sit-down with Dr Phil. You're just playing a game of follow the leader repeating everything you hear others say. You're part of this frustrated alliance that can't deal with differing opinions. You're getting personal and if you continue you'll be off my discussion list. This is the last time I'm repeating that so keep it civil and on topic or they'll be no further discussions between us. If the board wasn't moderated this would be fun.

I don't see how I was getting personal. I was giving my honest, unbiased opinion of what has transpired in this thread.

 

[peplaw06]

I don't see how I was getting personal. I was giving my honest, unbiased opinion of what has transpired in this thread.

It's like he's punching himself in the face and blaming it on everyone else.

 

[KJJ]

I don't see how I was getting personal. I was giving my honest, unbiased opinion of what has transpired in this thread.

You were giving a biased anti-KJJ opinion of what you think transpired. If you look through this thread at some of the crap/hate that's being posted you would think I stole a few posters wives and girlfriends. LOL

 

[DallasEast]

Sorry, the games you've mentioned don't count. I've coined the phrase "final elimination" games and none of those games were final elimination games because Dallas won them. Therefore, Staubach is a choker.

You've coined a phrase and are arguing something that's making you look very silly. If you can't figure out why Roger Staubach had the reputation he had and Romo has the reputation he has then you're lost.

Pot meet kettle.

The phrase I coined 2 1/2 years ago on this board is being used by everyone.

lol!

Am I correct by saying that you are accrediting yourself for a long-standing colloquialism, used throughout the world and various cultures, which you may have used first on this site two and a half years ago?

The very next reply is here:

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/loss-forensics-romo-vs-the-leagues-top-qb.292741/page-55#post-5593556

I was joking but he never skipped a beat.

No one could make this stuff up even if they tried.

 

[5Stars]

The very next reply is here:

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/loss-forensics-romo-vs-the-leagues-top-qb.292741/page-55#post-5593556

I was joking but he never skipped a beat.

No one could make this stuff up even if they tried.

Oh, he will try...and try...and try again, over and over and over, until he has the last word. He loves to win arguments, even when he is wrong. It's a troll tactic of his...well not just his. lol

 

[KJJ]

The very next reply is here:

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/loss-forensics-romo-vs-the-leagues-top-qb.292741/page-55#post-5593556

I was joking but he never skipped a beat.

No one could make this stuff up even if they tried.

Of the 6 games gimmesix listed 4 of those games were playoff games and 1 was a SB. The other game vs the Raiders was a season finale game but it wasn't an "elimination game." He failed to list the 11 playoff wins and 2 SB victories Staubach had which is why the 6 games he listed didn't add a black eye to Staubach's career. He's trying to compare a few of the playoff failures of a HOF QB who appeared in as many SB's as Romo has playoff appearances.

Because Romo's playoff resume is so small and he hasn't led the Cowboys to the playoffs in 4 years we're forced to add season finale elimination games to his playoff record to increase his sample size. It's ridiculous to compare a great QB who was known for being clutch in the final minutes of HUGE games with one who has built a solid reputation for choking in the final minutes of big games. Feel free to list all the "elimination games" Romo was clutch during the final few minutes.

 

[DallasEast]

Of the 6 games gimmesix listed 4 of those games were playoff games and 1 was a SB. The other game vs the Raiders was a season finale game but it wasn't an "elimination game." He failed to list the 11 playoff wins and 2 SB victories Staubach had which is why the 6 games he listed didn't add a black eye to Staubach's career. He's trying to compare a few of the playoff failures of a HOF QB who appeared in as many SB's as Romo has playoff appearances.

Because Romo's playoff resume is so small and he hasn't led the Cowboys to the playoffs in 4 years we're forced to add season finale elimination games to his playoff record to increase his sample size. It's ridiculous to compare a great QB who was known for being clutch in the final minutes of HUGE games with one who has built a solid reputation for choking in the final minutes of big games. Feel free to list all the "elimination games" Romo was clutch during the final few minutes.

LOL!

 

[KJJ]

I'm still laughing at that FAN who said the stats don't say there's a stigma with Romo. LOL That shows just how misleading all these stats are and how FANS buy into them.

 

[KJJ]

LOL!

If that's all you got than it's obvious you don't have anything to refute it.

 

[KJJ]

In those 6 playoff losses by Staubach I can only remember him throwing a pick at the end of one of those games and that was against the Steelers in SB X. That came in a desperation situation and he gets a pass for it because he had a SB win on his resume and a couple of weeks prior to SB X he had one of the great clutch performances of his career vs Minn in the divisional round. All QB's get a pass for some bad playoff games when they have a resume that consists of 11 playoff wins and multiple championships.

 

[DallasEast]

If that's all you got than it's obvious you don't have anything to refute it.

Refute? lmao.

My friend, I have not referred to what you keep rambling on about. Not once. You might figure that out some day.

Oh, what the heck.

Hint: long-standing colloquialism.

Hint Part Deux: "Two and a half years" is not "long-standing."

Hint Two and Three Quarters: It's not what you keep rambling on about.

The Hint Finale: If your next reply is correct, I will reply, "OMG! You got it!" If not, my reply will be "LMAO!"

 

[KJJ]

Refute? lmao.

My friend, I have not referred to what you keep rambling on about. Not once. You might figure that out some day.

Oh, what the heck.

Hint: long-standing colloquialism.

Hint Part Deux: "Two and a half years" is not "long-standing."

Hint Two and Three Quarters: It's not what you keep rambling on about.

The Hint Finale: If your next reply is correct, I will reply, "OMG! You got it!" If not, my reply will be "LMAO!"

You claim I'm rambling on? I'm debunking everything that's being posted. Romo/Staubach big game comparison? LOL

 

[burmafrd]

In those 6 playoff losses by Staubach I can only remember him throwing a pick at the end of one of those games and that was against the Steelers in SB X. That came in a desperation situation and he gets a pass for it because he had a SB win on his resume and a couple of weeks prior to SB X he had one of the great clutch performances of his career vs Minn in the divisional round. All QB's get a pass for some bad playoff games when they have a resume that consists of 11 playoff wins and multiple championships.

not sure if you realize it yet but right now you are the laughing stock of this thread.

 

[DallasEast]

You claim I'm rambling on? LOL I'm refuting everything that's being posted.

LMAO!

 

[KJJ]

not sure if you realize it yet but right now you are the laughing stock of this thread.

You need to take Mr T's advice. LOL

 

[KJJ]

One FAN claims the stats show there's isn't any stigma with Romo and another FAN is trying to spin that Staubach was a choker based off 5 of his 17 playoff games. No one is getting a bigger laugh than me. LOL