mardwin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,849
- Reaction score
- 9,825
thats alot of beef there, and they fleeced the Rams for Stafford....but at the end of the day they are still the Lions
You know people say the same thing about Dallas.
thats alot of beef there, and they fleeced the Rams for Stafford....but at the end of the day they are still the Lions
Exactly . We aren’t getting a once in a life time QB.Lots of qbs can throw a ball when they have time to throw. Lots of rbs can run the ball when you make holes for them. Games are won and lost in the trenches. Always have been. Always will.
Waiting 25 years for a mahomes type player is the outlier. Not the norm.
Every housewife in America has a fantasy team.Doesn't matter, that league is gone.
The Chiefs guards were the worst run blockers in the league last year...they had no problem scoring bc they have a qb and wrs.
You can win with good skill players and an average ol. You absolutely can't win with poor skill players and a great ol.
Ya taking a year to figure out Goff is a bad move. The guy is terrible and being surrounded by significantly less talent and a less creative coach definitely isnt going to help. I thought Fields was the smart pick for them.They didn't take a quarterback, and have nothing at WR, so the rest is pretty meaningless.
They're building a team that has no chance at contending.
They won't be the Lions of old for long. Dan seems to appreciate draft capital and draft value. Dallas stopped being the Cowboys of the 90s when JJ decided he had all of this draft stuff figured out.
Nope.Lots of qbs can throw a ball when they have time to throw. Lots of rbs can run the ball when you make holes for them. Games are won and lost in the trenches. Always have been. Always will.
Waiting 25 years for a mahomes type player is the outlier. Not the norm.
Parsons > allLook at this haul the Lions got:
-Sewell
-Onwuz
-McNeil
-Melifonwu
Maybe we should of hired him over
They didn't take a quarterback, and have nothing at WR, so the rest is pretty meaningless.
They're building a team that has no chance at contending.
Not without a quarterback you don't, and no it isn't.
You can scheme to compensate for average OL, you can't compensate for a lack of playmakers
It's a project that has no chance of success without a QB. It'd be 2-3 years if they had a qb, right now, there is no reasonable timeline that they'll contend
Fields was right there for the taking and they did the worst thing possible. They're purposely building to be what they Bears were last year.