Man, Beasley is Tiny... pic

While it is difficult to make out, you can still see a jersey number underneath the yellow vest. Can't say it's an 8, but it clearly is not a 1. The second number is a 1.

So if the guy in the pic is not wearing an 11, but could be wearing 81, It's not Cole Beasley in that picture and it may be Danny Coale.

There's nothing in that pic that tells me its from this year either. It could be 2012.

Edit: Since the only two WRs with a 1 are Beasley and Coale at 81 and 11, it's got to be Coale.
 
xwalker;5093355 said:
Amos, Anthony 5-11 179
Armstrong, Anthony 5-11 179
Austin, Miles 6-2 217
Beasley, Cole 5-8 177
Benford, Tim 5-11 200
Bryant, Dez 6-2 220
Coale, Danny 6-0 190
Green, Jared 6-1 185
Harris, Dwayne 5-10 200
Rogers, Eric 6-3 211
Williams, Terrance 6-2 202

Cut:
Mitchell, Carlton 6-3 215

Amos is interesting. I thought he was one of the best WR's at the East-West Shrine game. Mayock and Charles Davis were gushing over him. Maybe he plays well enough to knock Benford off of the PS.
 
PullMyFinger;5093361 said:
Coale will beat him out for the final WR spot

Tend to believe you're right, just because he's more versatile. Beasley is basically a slot guy. Between Austin and Harris, we already have a couple of guys there.
 
That is absolutely not Beasley. He is wearing a different helmet, and has never worn that style of helmet/mask.
 
688_10151628239404171_1525782056_n.jpg
 
Blue Eyed Devil;5093118 said:
Danny Coale is 6'0" 190lbs, he's bigger than Morris Claiborne.

Why do some posters think he is small or could even be mistaken for Cole Beasely? Beasely is 4 inches smaller than Coale, it's not even possible to mistake them.

they are both white fringe WR so that is where some are confusing them but your right...they have totally different body types.
 
Some of you are just plain goofy.

Always trying to find fault with our players. For you I have this to say.....


GREAT,...If it is indeed Coale in that picture then its not Beasley. That means that Beasley isnt quite as small and frail as some suggest.

And if it is in fact Coale,...then now we know that its a deceiving picture as we know for sure that Coale is around 6 foot 190 pounds or so!

Now whats your complaint?
 
Jay Ratliff, Demarco Murrey, Sean Lee, Bruce Carter, Miles Austin, .......Whats theyre excuse ? Not a one of them could be considered small or frail yet they sure missed a ton of games.
 
iowast8rs;5093112 said:
It's not the size of the dog in a fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.


That's true, right up to the point you lose consiousness........
 
Avenging Hayseed;5093620 said:
Some of you are just plain goofy.

Always trying to find fault with our players. For you I have this to say.....


GREAT,...If it is indeed Coale in that picture then its not Beasley. That means that Beasley isnt quite as small and frail as some suggest.

And if it is in fact Coale,...then now we know that its a deceiving picture as we know for sure that Coale is around 6 foot 190 pounds or so!

Now whats your complaint?

No, it just means it is not Beasly in the picture tbh.
 
I've never understood the fascination with Beasley. He's built like a 7th grader.
 
ABQCOWBOY;5093791 said:
That's true, right up to the point you lose consiousness........

I take it you never watched the early UFC style tournaments before they believed in weight classes lol...

[youtube]gVs4930ERGw[/youtube]

[youtube]sJuQP0hO6s4[/youtube]


[youtube]QzU-y9sZk5k[/youtube]

[youtube]bgHiVxu19c4[/youtube]

I remember watching some of those matches and thinking the little guy was going to get killed.:laugh2:
 
So we will have a tiny slot man. Fine with me.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,016
Messages
14,506,837
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top