Woods
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,460
- Reaction score
- 61
cutting or trading Glover due to his high cap number this year and because he isn't the best fit in a 3-4 defense.
Let's assume that Glover is NOT on the team this coming season.
I think we HAVE to get a big wide-body NT to rotate with Fergy.
If Fergy were to get banged up again in '06, I don't see how we could successfully run the 3-4 with our current DL personnel.
I'm not sure a late round draft pick is enough insurance either. Unfortunately, Ngata will likely be gone by 18, and I'm not sold on G. Watson's dedication (according to what I've been reading about him).
I think we should go the FA route and pick up a wide body next month. Also, IF we were to cut/trade Glover, I'd imagine we would have some cap savings to contribute to shoring up this position.
Again, I think if we are going to be running the 3-4 even more in 2006 than in 2005, having Fergy as the only legitimate NT is dangerous. One injury to him and it doesn't really matter who your ILBs are . . . .
Let's assume that Glover is NOT on the team this coming season.
I think we HAVE to get a big wide-body NT to rotate with Fergy.
If Fergy were to get banged up again in '06, I don't see how we could successfully run the 3-4 with our current DL personnel.
I'm not sure a late round draft pick is enough insurance either. Unfortunately, Ngata will likely be gone by 18, and I'm not sold on G. Watson's dedication (according to what I've been reading about him).
I think we should go the FA route and pick up a wide body next month. Also, IF we were to cut/trade Glover, I'd imagine we would have some cap savings to contribute to shoring up this position.
Again, I think if we are going to be running the 3-4 even more in 2006 than in 2005, having Fergy as the only legitimate NT is dangerous. One injury to him and it doesn't really matter who your ILBs are . . . .