iceberg
rock music matters
- Messages
- 34,447
- Reaction score
- 7,961
rkell87;4553426 said:this is where you misunderstood the article
no. it's where he "ok'd" governing simple activities.
**** and eat a cupcake lastnordiq.
rkell87;4553426 said:this is where you misunderstood the article
iceberg;4553508 said:all of this - ALL OF THIS - is "you give an inch they take a mile".
suddenly simple things are life or death cause you decreased the meaning so much over time nothing was worth fighting for.
so you fight for everything.
our problems are not rights to have a bake sale.
our problems are we got so far off course this became a problem.
TheLastNordique;4552966 said:You mean the school system shouldn't be able to dictate how it's money is raised???
I don't see how stopping bake sales that go to the school and usually utilize school time and resources are suddenly "off limits".
Let me ask it this way...
Would you be alright with kids selling porn to raise money for the school??
Furthermore, even if said fundraisers don't go to the school, the district has the right to say what can and cannot be allowed on its property, no??
jnday;4553600 said:With the problems that common people face today, our government chooses to work on this. Child abuse, homeless families, the economy, and the price of healthcare are some problems that could be addressed. I guess the bake sale was causing the public more problems.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:In some pure fashion, yes it is government intrustion, but it's not different from the many other laws restricting waht you can and cannot do on certain properties.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:Furthermore, it's not infringing on your right to have a bake sale, it's stopping you from having that bake sale on the schools time or property because it believes it is harmful.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:A school district has a right (to some extent) to decide what is or is not allowable on it's property.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:Is it "deciding what's best for you"? In some fashion, but so are laws against consentual pedophilia, drugs, age limits for driving, drinking and smoking, ect ect.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:I simply think that the school district has a right to ban the promotion of certain foods that are proven to have be causal to serious health problems.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:Yes, it is some level of intrusion, but I do think the principle that there are certain things that are harmful and should not be permissible in certain environments is a sound one.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:I also think it's quite dangerous to reject that principle, as it leads down a path I don't think most of us want to see.
TheLastNordique;4553418 said:FWIW, I would have a markedly different opinion if this was about a school district banning...long hair or something decidedly banal.