Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
Isaac Purple Haze.
Show me a Tweet from him and I will tell you it is a stone cold mortal lock.
Isaac Purple Haze.
Completely agree about forcing picks. I guess I was just saying that, based on the rankings I am looking at, it could work out nicely for the Cowboys in the first two rounds with there being good players at positions of need (DE and CB).
I focused on Watt because he was specifically mentioned in the article but, I could easily see Harris, McKinley or Charlton being the DE at 28 as well.
As they say in military, no plan survives first contact with the enemy. That's what makes the draft must see TV for me.
AgreeIf a quality edge rusher is available, I think it would be a mistake not to take one. Yes, CB is a position of need but I also see the success of this dfense starting with putting opposing QBs under duress. We need to get more pressure, which will automatically make the CB position better
Scary quote of the day:
Well, no Ware. But we see some positive things going on here. Corner up, boys.
You might want to take your blinders off. I didn't read that as them going CB early and off.
Frankly that makes me think they are desperate to find the next Ware.
Lets hope this isnt strike three bcause the count is 0-2 after Lawrence and Gregory.I didn't read that as them going CB early and off.
Frankly that makes me think they are desperate to find the next Ware.
Tankersley's name keeps popping up in association with the Cowboys. Perhaps more than any other cornerback we have visited with other than Adoree Jackson.
I don't think he is good enough to justify 28 though.
Unless it is a QB, it is foolish to worry about the fifth year option.If he's their guy then I wish they would move back but they won't.
They like that 5th year option more then another player.
If he left it at the "no Ware" comment, I would believe you. But to add that there that little positive spin at it leaves the door open to "is this guy any better than the 'good solid football players' we have"?
How anyone can look at the pass rushers we have and see "good, solid" after getting killed by the lack of pressure in the game that ended our season is beyond me.
Meanwhile, selling a CB is relatively easy because they are short bodies there.
We have only three players at CB that have started an NFL game! Everybody knows you can never have enough cornerbacks!
and we don't need a ROT ? MIGHT BE CAM ROBINSON
.I am not sure you read his quote properly.
He seems to be saying we have some good DL but we are missing the guy that when you break the huddle teams wonder "where is that guy lined up."
They want that type of guy again
I don't think your scenario really works as it is not a definite any of the three pass rushers make it to 60.
On the other hand, it is very likely that a good CB like Tankersley, Fabian Moreau, Sidney Jones or Quincy Wilson make it to 60.
I would be very disappointed if we try to play that little game and end up having to force the pick of a DE that is outside of value parameters.
All in all, if I had to play the sheer numerical averages, you quite simply don't go corner in the first unless the value is there. Outside of Lattimore and Conley, you could have your pick of five to seven cornerbacks all clustered together in terms of value.
They need star players, not more OK players.
IF they don't see the available DEs as likely star type players, then they should pick another position.
I prefer to just wait if the options are all DLaw types.
To me, more CBs might mean it's more likely one of them is going to be great.
.
If you mean "properly" as like you did, no.
I read the quote and I fully understand he is saying there is no player like Ware that teams worry about.
How many NFL teams have that kind of player? Four or five? Means nothing to me.
And so does every other NFL team, every year, every draft. But you don't see many of them saying "but we got some good solid ones though!".