Fla Cowpoke
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,025
- Reaction score
- 12,046
OK, just the messenger in regard to the ESPN report, but I am not expecting much out of Bridgewater.
was andrew luck too good to be true? some qb's just have it.
So Mayock changes his tune, I guess I might be right?
NFLNetwork's Mike Mayock said, "I would not take [Louisville QB Teddy Bridgewater] in the first round of the draft."
"I've never seen a top-level quarterback in the last 10 years have a bad pro day, until Teddy Bridgewater," said Mayock. "He had no accuracy, the ball came out funny, the arm strength wasn't there, and it made me question everything I saw on tape because this was live." Bridgewater looks poised to have a Geno Smith-like slide down the draft.
You heard of Luck for 2-3yrs. I can't really say, I've heard of him for that long.
I think Mayock along with Kiper are hearing rumblings from scouts and friends within inner circles. Just studying tape is not going to change your opinion from a top 10 pick to the 2nd round. A pro day is really not going to change anything.
I think Mayock along with Kiper are hearing rumblings from scouts and friends within inner circles. Just studying tape is not going to change your opinion from a top 10 pick to the 2nd round. A pro day is really not going to change anything.
Kiper's process is as follows:
Study a the draft a little and put out some rankings.
Get feedback from people he knows on NFL teams.
Update his rankings based on the feedback.
Get feedback from people he knows on NFL teams.
Update his rankings based on the feedback.
Get feedback from people he knows on NFL teams.
Update his rankings based on the feedback.
Get feedback from people he knows on NFL teams.
Update his rankings based on the feedback.
You don't even know what you're talking about.
You missed the point. He obviously knows the prospects because he can answer a question about any player.He doesn't "study the draft a little". He lives it year round.
You may not like him. You may even think you know better, but nobody can ever accuse him of being lazy and not doing the work.
Does he have connections within the league feeding him information? What draft analyst of his stature wouldn't? What do you think his lisping counterpart is doing on NFLN as their wannabe Kiper? The very same thing.
Yeah, Mel Kiper "studies the draft a little". Like Jerry Jones is a bit of a micromanager and Andy Reid has a slight eating problem.
I have watched a pretty fair amount of Bridgewater's games and that dude just flat gets it done on the football field. I have never seen pressure phase him in the slightest. Sitting behind Romo for a few years would result in a decade long solution at QB. It would be extremely foolish to pass up on that.
You missed the point. He obviously knows the prospects because he can answer a question about any player.
It his rankings that are come from the feedback that he gets. If he only ranked based on his own film evaluation his rankings wouldn't vary so much from the beginning to the final.
Can the same be said, about Teebow in college?
No, the two situations aren't remotely similar.
So Mayock changes his tune, I guess I might be right?
NFLNetwork's Mike Mayock said, "I would not take [Louisville QB Teddy Bridgewater] in the first round of the draft."
"I've never seen a top-level quarterback in the last 10 years have a bad pro day, until Teddy Bridgewater," said Mayock. "He had no accuracy, the ball came out funny, the arm strength wasn't there, and it made me question everything I saw on tape because this was live." Bridgewater looks poised to have a Geno Smith-like slide down the draft.
You missed the point. He obviously knows the prospects because he can answer a question about any player.
It his rankings that are come from the feedback that he gets. If he only ranked based on his own film evaluation his rankings wouldn't vary so much from the beginning to the final.
I have watched a pretty fair amount of Bridgewater's games and that dude just flat gets it done on the football field. I have never seen pressure phase him in the slightest. Sitting behind Romo for a few years would result in a decade long solution at QB. It would be extremely foolish to pass up on that.
If his rankings didn't change much there wouldn't be as much interest week to week through the months of the draft. I agree with that.