McCarthy and that 4th and 4

[Jake]

They're showing a lot of faith in Rush in those situations - remember going for 4th and 2 in our end vs the Bengals - and he's rewarded that trust.

 

[Runwildboys]

Mike seems to take more risky chances when he thinks the other team might beat us.

It's a good philosophy. Better than playing conservatively.

 

[jwooten15]

Didn’t like the call. Not going to change my mind because it actually worked.

So you’d rather be like Garrett and be eternally conservative and just hope not to lose?

 

[CowboyRoy]

So you’d rather be like Garrett and be eternally conservative and just hope not to lose?

no, but didn’t like the call. I would have relied on our defense there.

 

[Proof]

Do you think Dak would dare attempt that throw?

yes. countless times lol. stop the madness

 

[jwooten15]

no, but didn’t like the call. I would have relied on our defense there.

I can understand the logic there. The defense played lights out in the second half

 

[loublue22]

quick, effortless motion, accurate

 

[Proof]

They're showing a lot of faith in Rush in those situations - remember going for 4th and 2 in our end vs the Bengals - and he's rewarded that trust.

true, but also necessary. what do they have to lose

 

[J12B]

If they said that wasn't a first down I wouldn't even be upset. I actually am not sure if it was. Really close.

They went to a hurry up right after so I guess the Kellen or McCarthy thought the same. Didn't want to give them time to look at it.

 

[Manster68]

Gutsy call.

I was surprised he went for it there.

Nice job coach.

Oh and I thought Lamb may have not gotten full control until he was backed up a bit and the spot would've been close....anyone else think that?

I thought McCarthy had a pretty big pair of elephant testicles to make that call.

 

[mmohican29]

Gutsy call.

I was surprised he went for it there.

Nice job coach.

Oh and I thought Lamb may have not gotten full control until he was backed up a bit and the spot would've been close....anyone else think that?

No