exciter
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,179
- Reaction score
- 3,844
Well that’s the reality of today’s NFL.The second receiver, if he's a threat, draws attention away from that No. 1 receiver, thus either making him more effective or becoming the target the QB looks for. The first season in McCarthy's scheme, defenses still respected Cooks enough to not just focus all of their attention on Lamb and when they did focus on Lamb, Ferguson was effective enough for us to still make a play. However, teams like Green Bay understood that Cooks wasn't good enough anymore to draw attention off Lamb. This year, neither Ferguson or Cooks was good enough so Lamb was the only real threat we had.
I disagree with you again. You get what you pay for. Cooper with Lamb would have been a much more effective 1-2 punch than what we've had without Cooper. If the idea is you can't pay this player that much or you can't play that player this much, then you've become Jerry Jones. We need more top players to supplement this roster, not to give away the ones that we have to replace them with lesser. You move on from players when you've got better options, a No. 3 receiver coming off an ACL tear was not a better option.
They could have dropped 20m base on a WR and neglected the rest of the team. If I remember correctly that 20m that first season was used to pay for the franchise tag on the TE, resign Armstrong, Vander Esch, Kearse and sign Fowler.
In McCarthy’s final full season in Green Bay his 1st and 2nd option combined for around 2500 yards. CD and Ferguson as the 1st/2nd option combined for around 2500 yards. The packers did it with Jordy Nelson and an emerging Davantae Adams on a rookie contract. Remember what happened to Nelson when it became apparent it was time to move Adams to the #1!