Twitter: McCarthy: We're going to run the ball

5ee4ee07c530b.jpg
 
Dang, they don't even try to hide the fact they have no faith in our passing game.
Well we better run and the defense once again has a bunch of T/O or we are losing to the Bears.:(
Would you be saying the same thing if Rush was QB? Would you be predicting a loss to the Bears?
 
Dang, they don't even try to hide the fact they have no faith in our passing game.
Well we better run and the defense once again has a bunch of T/O or we are losing to the Bears.:(

24 / 7
This is about the running game, but yet here you are with the same old crap.
24 / 7
 
The issue with losing Zeke is that you have a great pass protector and a guy who can get positive yards even if it's just 2-3. He pounds on the defense and then Pollard can come in gut them for a big gain. I don't know how effective Pollard will be with 20 carries and having pass blocking assignments since he'll be playing the majority of the game.
 
Zeke will play, but we will get the......game time decision...... until then.
 
Pollard has given up a total of 4 sacks his entire 4 year career.

Elliot is normally in for protection if they leave a running back to pickup blitzes. So given that if Pollard is in on passing downs, the majority of the time he is out on a route, I am not sure how much of a ringing endorsement that really is.

But on just 105 snaps though. I hope he can get better in that area, if so he can easily be a primary back. Every touch he gets feels like it could be a home run.

If this number of protection snaps is correct, it just proves how misleading saying 4 sacks in 4 years really is. If we had a lineman giving up that sack percentage we would be calling for his head.

Agree on the home run part.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,121
Messages
13,789,945
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top