McNair

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I don't think the alcohol was a big issue, cheating on your wife with a crazy woman on the other hand is a bad mix.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Vtwin;2852492 said:
No, I don't think that. Just like you don't get the same mind altering affects from pot and alcohol. Or pot and cocaine. Or Alcohol and cocaine. Or Meth and heroin. etc etc etc.

And again, you are wrong. Nowhere near "everybody" puts in on a higher scale. I'll agree that many, mostly ill informed by by a century of scary propaganda may put in on a higher scale but I bet in some circles "everybody" would disagree completely.
Oh God. You're one of those. I really don't care to waste my time debating you on such a ridiculous proposition.

You are either choosing to ignore or are missing my point on relevancy. I don't know what type of law you practice but if you go to trial you surely have argued to supress or defending against the argument to supress what is, to an impartial observer, a relevant piece of evidence because of some technical issue. Point being, relevancy is in the eye of the attorney and can be based less on the truth then on the desired outcome.
Technicalities don't change the fact that it's relevant information. I may, as an example, argue that it's more prejudicial than relevant, but that doesn't change the fact that it's relevant, nor does it decrease the relevancy.

The word relevance has a very broad definition in the legal world. There's really no doubt that this is relevant information.
 

Vtwin

Safety third
Messages
8,677
Reaction score
12,163
peplaw06;2852511 said:
Oh God. You're one of those. I really don't care to waste my time debating you on such a ridiculous proposition.

LOL

You don't have any real experience with pot or the people who use it do you?


Technicalities don't change the fact that it's relevant information. I may, as an example, argue that it's more prejudicial than relevant, but that doesn't change the fact that it's relevant, nor does it decrease the relevancy.

The word relevance has a very broad definition in the legal world. There's really no doubt that this is relevant information.

Oh God. You're one of those.

I can see it is a waste of time to debate this with you as you could spin a web that states the sun revolves around the earth and think you made it sound plausible.

You can defend me any time though. :)
 
Top