superpunk;1290790 said:McQ scores a TD. Book it.
speedkilz88;1290733 said:I took that he doesn't trust Flozell anymore(he's regressed lateley) and wants McQ waiting in the wings in case Flo has a complete meltdown. I think McQ is the starting LT next season, Flo might be traded.
abersonc;1290746 said:By that logic why would Bill announce that McQ was playing? If we all know what that means for Fabini then clearly Holmgren does too.
parchy;1291057 said:I don't think it really makes a difference. How much is Fabini's experience really going to help him today as opposed to McQuistan's lack of it?
abersonc;1291071 said:My thought was that if there was an injury Fabini would be a better option than a rookie seeing his first game action of his career in a playoff game.
Every chance Fabini has had to play this year he has looked pretty good.parchy;1291151 said:Maybe. But if Fabini has been as bad as Parcells' actions have dictated, I don't think you'd be able to notice a difference. At the very least, McQuistan's skill would make up the difference, assuming he has any.
abersonc;1290683 said:So McQuistan is going to be active -- presumably instead of Fabini -- today. I certainly understand McQ being active against Det to get him some experience. But today? This seems to be exactly the situation where we would want an experienced guy instead of a rookie in case there was an injury.
If Bill now wants to get the guy experience, then why wouldn't he just have been the active backup all season? And if that were the case, why have Fabini at all?