smarta5150
Mr. Wright
- Messages
- 7,163
- Reaction score
- 0
Bob Sacamano;1431746 said:I'm not an OSU fan, I'm just making fun of your school :laugh2:
Well then "my" school is Rider University.
And we have been undefeated since 1951.
Bob Sacamano;1431746 said:I'm not an OSU fan, I'm just making fun of your school :laugh2:
LatinMind;1431921 said:lol wow branch out of the top 25? lol what a joke kiper has turned out to be. if branch was there at 22 i dont think dallas would last 10 seconds on the clock
smarta5150;1431947 said:mmm hmmm
People are calling him fat and a slob but I would love if people fall into it and let him drop to us.
LatinMind;1431921 said:lol wow branch out of the top 25? lol what a joke kiper has turned out to be. if branch was there at 22 i dont think dallas would last 10 seconds on the clock
wayne_motley;1432301 said:apparently everyone has Branch slipping....it seems he showed up at the Combine and his workouts out of shape and with an attitude that his interviewers didn't take to at all.
I could very easily see a player like him dropping....how many teams are so desperate for a DT of his ilk?
I can live with a CB selection in round 1, but if we manage to get a WR like Jarrett or Meacham, I don't think either will be a number 4 for long. Both are infinitely more talented than Crayton, imo.fanfromvirginia;1432468 said:This is an unexciting run-up to the draft because we really don't have any must needs. WR, CB, NT. Those are our realistic first round options. Now that Branch is lazing his way out of the 1st round, we're likely down to WR or CB. We're not likely to get our future #1 WR at 22 in this draft and we don't need another #4-for-now prospect, which we have a few of. At CB, we need a #2 and I suppose at 22 that's about what we can expect, at least for the short term.
We've got 10 picks; way the hell more than we need but nothing worth trading up for except CJ, who is way the hell too expensive to make the move.
Anybody else feeling the draft blahs, like me?
On edit: Don't get me wrong. This is a good problem to have and a function of our improvement over the last few years and this offseason.
Eh, #3, #4, what's the difference. I know there's a difference and that our number 1 pick could turn into a future starter and all that. I'm just not excited about it.wayne_motley;1432600 said:I can live with a CB selection in round 1, but if we manage to get a WR like Jarrett or Meacham, I don't think either will be a number 4 for long. Both are infinitely more talented than Crayton, imo.
fanfromvirginia;1432609 said:Eh, #3, #4, what's the difference. I know there's a difference and that our number 1 pick could turn into a future starter and all that. I'm just not excited about it.
In past drafts we've had multiple holes in our starting lineup that needed plugging. We just don't have that this year. Which is a good thing, I repeat to avoid getting flamed.
A reasonable, practical list. Just gawdawful boring. This would be a great year for trading up given our extra picks and reduced needs but there's just not that much extra value there in the affordable 10-21 range at positions we need. Oh, my kingdom for a Ngata in '07.dffl31;1432623 said:I agree so much with this statement!
I would love to see Dallas get the best OL available at 22 or
one of three WR (Jarrett, Bowe, Meachem)
but most of all just address BPA by back up nneds : Center, OLB, ILB, DE, and OL. And most of all a solid 300 plus DT/NT
With Hamlin on board (i hope) we do not need to address SS or FS in any of our 1st day picks. (Roy, Davis, Hamlin, Watkins)
fanfromvirginia;1432663 said:A reasonable, practical list. Just gawdawful boring. This would be a great year for trading up given our extra picks and reduced needs but there's just not that much extra value there in the affordable 10-21 range at positions we need. Oh, my kingdom for a Ngata in '07.