Michael Irvin returns to NFL Network

[MarcusRock]

Got to love it to playmaker back on the air I was behind him all the way.

Great to see all of you who spouted your mouth off early on have to eat your words classic.

I can't name names because I'm a DieHard and don't want to Rock the boat.

Lol. All the black and white thinkers need to see this as win or lose with them as the winner because of the debates that went down. Can't speak for what others said but what words am I eating exactly? All I did was parse the data that was available because I found the case interesting and because the pro-Irvins couldn't refute the facts his lawyer lied and the witnesses they championed were shown to be liars, they got mad. I said Marriott wasn't at fault here and just as folks avoided facts then, they ignore that this settlement happened on the first full day of the NFL season. Who was that more critical for operations-wise? Irvin or Marriott? And hence, who probably gave in more in the case? I'm curious if Marriott actually had to pay anything at all. As I asked earlier of other wannabe "winners" in this with no response, what does a settlement actually prove and what was I wrong about? Still waiting for those answers. Those who ran from the convo before are coming back to try to claim victory now? Over a settlement with these optics? Hilarious.

 

[Motorola]

So... will Irvin still be on "Undisputed"?

 

[Bullflop]

I believe the female accuser that was involved in that dispute might easily have been mistaken to believe that Michael had ulterior motives.
Apparently, those involved in that case accepted that idea. Otherwise, Irvin likely may not have been welcomed back into the fold.

 

[Blackrain]

Lol. All the black and white thinkers need to see this as win or lose with them as the winner because of the debates that went down. Can't speak for what others said but what words am I eating exactly? All I did was parse the data that was available because I found the case interesting and because the pro-Irvins couldn't refute the facts his lawyer lied and the witnesses they championed were shown to be liars, they got mad. I said Marriott wasn't at fault here and just as folks avoided facts then, they ignore that this settlement happened on the first full day of the NFL season. Who was that more critical for operations-wise? Irvin or Marriott? And hence, who probably gave in more in the case? I'm curious if Marriott actually had to pay anything at all. As I asked earlier of other wannabe "winners" in this with no response, what does a settlement actually prove and what was I wrong about? Still waiting for those answers. Those who ran from the convo before are coming back to try to claim victory now? Over a settlement with these optics? Hilarious.

Well Marcus Michael is black and I am white and it's a win for both of us.
Michael has his job back that's definitely a win for him.
A former cowboy player who provided me with many hours of enjoyment stay the course and one another battle that's a win for me because my faith in him never wavered I was always on his side.

Long story short in today's world where everyone can find a reason to be offended by almost anything if Michael Irvin was guilty of anything real he would have never gotten his job back on national television.
Embrace the victory of this former cowboy great and learn to live with it

 

[MarcusRock]

Well Marcus Michael is black and I am white and it's a win for both of us.
Michael has his job back that's definitely a win for him.
A former cowboy player who provided me with many hours of enjoyment stay the course and one another battle that's a win for me because my faith in him never wavered I was always on his side.

Long story short in today's world where everyone can find a reason to be offended by almost anything if Michael Irvin was guilty of anything real he would have never gotten his job back on national television.
Embrace the victory of this former cowboy great and learn to live with it

See, but you didn't come in talking about a victory without also coming in talking about people eating their words, naming me among them, so don't walk it back now. I'm asking you, what words? If I said Mike wouldn't get his job back or shouldn't get his job back then I could see and would own up to it, but where did I? I even said I felt bad for what was happening to Mike a few times but people ignored that because I also examined the facts which they didn't want to talk about if it didn't favor what they wanted to be true. But I only do truth so what other people want is irrelevant to me.

So what we get here are the effects of trauma: feeling so victimized that they have to strawman the opposition to manufacture a "win" because they were being made to fear the worst (this is where CONSPIRACY! comes from with the Cowboys but I can't take credit for that one - they're crazy all on their own, lol). The trigger of your last paragraph above also made people react that way so I guess they need targets now. It ain't me unless you can tell me where I was wrong. I keep asking and get silence or dancing in response. Ben Vereen would be proud of the tap dances, lol.

 

[TequilaCowboy]

Glad to have him back on TV again, even though i don't watch much of him or others since i just consider it as white noise. Just a lot of jabbering. I do remember he is a card carrying homer like Skip and Marcus. But more entertaining. I knew that the NFL was wrong in their knee jerk reaction firing him on the spot with no proof or evidence. And Marriott for kicking him out was absolutely insane. Don't know if he still has that suit going but he should.

 

[VaqueroTD]

Glad to have him back on TV again, even though i don't watch much of him or others since i just consider it as white noise. Just a lot of jabbering. I do remember he is a card carrying homer like Skip and Marcus. But more entertaining. I knew that the NFL was wrong in their knee jerk reaction firing him on the spot with no proof or evidence. And Marriott for kicking him out was absolutely insane. Don't know if he still has that suit going but he should.

Question: When did Skip Bayless become a Cowboys homer? They joke about it now but all I remember him for in Dallas was trying to incite the team and writing non-stop gossip rags to cash in on the dynasty’s bandwagon.

 

[GMO415]

Congratulations Playmaker. So no more Skip?

 

[gtb1943]

Lol. All the black and white thinkers need to see this as win or lose with them as the winner because of the debates that went down. Can't speak for what others said but what words am I eating exactly? All I did was parse the data that was available because I found the case interesting and because the pro-Irvins couldn't refute the facts his lawyer lied and the witnesses they championed were shown to be liars, they got mad. I said Marriott wasn't at fault here and just as folks avoided facts then, they ignore that this settlement happened on the first full day of the NFL season. Who was that more critical for operations-wise? Irvin or Marriott? And hence, who probably gave in more in the case? I'm curious if Marriott actually had to pay anything at all. As I asked earlier of other wannabe "winners" in this with no response, what does a settlement actually prove and what was I wrong about? Still waiting for those answers. Those who ran from the convo before are coming back to try to claim victory now? Over a settlement with these optics? Hilarious.

We get it. You hate Irvin. You really need a hobby.

 

[G2]

See, but you didn't come in talking about a victory without also coming in talking about people eating their words, naming me among them, so don't walk it back now. I'm asking you, what words? If I said Mike wouldn't get his job back or shouldn't get his job back then I could see and would own up to it, but where did I? I even said I felt bad for what was happening to Mike a few times but people ignored that because I also examined the facts which they didn't want to talk about if it didn't favor what they wanted to be true. But I only do truth so what other people want is irrelevant to me.

So what we get here are the effects of trauma: feeling so victimized that they have to strawman the opposition to manufacture a "win" because they were being made to fear the worst (this is where CONSPIRACY! comes from with the Cowboys but I can't take credit for that one - they're crazy all on their own, lol). The trigger of your last paragraph above also made people react that way so I guess they need targets now. It ain't me unless you can tell me where I was wrong. I keep asking and get silence or dancing in response. Ben Vereen would be proud of the tap dances, lol.

Do you like any Dallas Cowboys or is this your thing, trying to look down your nose at everyone?

 

[MarcusRock]

We get it. You hate Irvin. You really need a hobby.

Do you like any Dallas Cowboys or is this your thing, trying to look down your nose at everyone?

Speaking of the triggered and their trauma .....

Sup, fanbois.

 

[G2]

Speaking of the triggered and their trauma .....

Sup, fanbois.

Asking a question = triggered? You sound mature.
It was a simple question. No need to attempt a "gotcha" moment premature.

 

[MarcusRock]

Asking a question = triggered? You sound mature.
It was a simple question. No need to attempt a "gotcha" moment premature.

The gotcha moment is me telling you previously that you'd follow me to comment on my posts again because you lack the control not to. And here you are again, fanboi. Was I right? So will you announce to the board again that you've put me on ignore letting everyone know of said lack of control? Lol.

 

[visionary]

So he was innocent, I remember certain posters already putting the blame on him

Exactly

 

[Merlin]

@CouchCoach was all over every Irvin/Mariott thread until this one. Had all kind of theories.

 

[Pass2Run]

Guilty or innocent, Irvin is one of the worst behind a mic. No matter who he gets paired with, you can clearly see the look of irritation and annoyance from others. He always talks over people and slurs all over the place. Only diehard Cowboys fans thinks he has any real mic talent.

I feel so bad for Rich Eisen. He's a class act. And all Irvin does is act a fool. Like he's loaded every time he's on air, which he probably is.

People like him. Oh well. I just can't take him seriously.

 

[G2]

The gotcha moment is me telling you previously that you'd follow me to comment on my posts again because you lack the control not to. And here you are again, fanboi. Was I right? So will you announce to the board again that you've put me on ignore letting everyone know of said lack of control? Lol.

You're not on ignore, no one is. Which is why I can see your pompous posts.
You must have missed the day they did forum instruction. Responding to a post isn't following you. You're not that important. But occasionally, you do pop out from the shadows with a "World according to me" POV and I think it's hilarious.
And you can't even be a big person and answer the questions. Nope! Here come the silly childish name calling from you. Anything to avoid a simple question.
Fanboi? Come on.

 

[G2]

I feel so bad for Rich Eisen. He's a class act. And all Irvin does is act a fool. Like he's loaded every time he's on air, which he probably is.

People like him. Oh well. I just can't take him seriously.

I would if there wasn't so much theatrics.

 

[MarcusRock]

You're not on ignore, no one is. Which is why I can see your pompous posts.
You must have missed the day they did forum instruction. Responding to a post isn't following you. You're not that important. But occasionally, you do pop out from the shadows with a "World according to me" POV and I think it's hilarious.
And you can't even be a big person and answer the questions. Nope! Here come the silly childish name calling from you. Anything to avoid a simple question.
Fanboi? Come on.

Bro, you announced to the board that you had me on ignore before. The weakest move there is here, IMO. So either you lied or lacked further control and couldn't help tuning back in to see what I was saying so you could get mad all over again. Tortured people here, just like I was saying yesterday. Lol

And you didn't come in here to discuss the topic, you got triggered and only wanted to discuss me. That's the essence of a fanboi. gtb is the king of that though so you've got work to do if you want the top spot.

So, see you next time then? Because we know there'll be a next time.

 

[G2]

Bro, you announced to the board that you had me on ignore before. The weakest move there is here, IMO. So either you lied or lacked further control and couldn't help tuning back in to see what I was saying so you could get mad all over again. Tortured people here, just like I was saying yesterday. Lol

And you didn't come in here to discuss the topic, you got triggered and only wanted to discuss me. That's the essence of a fanboi. gtb is the king of that though so you've got work to do if you want the top spot.

So, see you next time then? Because we know there'll be a next time.

Bro, I'm not sure why you think your the principle here. Whether or not I blocked anyone in the past doesn't matter. I just told you I don't have anyone blocked. Are you dense?
And you seriously think it's about you? Lmao.
You also need to Google the definition of triggered. Because you're ignorant to it.

Still can't answer the simplest of questions, must deflect! Lol.