Enter the thread to discuss the topic at hand instead of just me and I'll answer all questions. I don't run. But people don't like that either and I get fanbois. Lol.Bro, I'm not sure why you think your the principle here. Whether or not I blocked anyone in the past doesn't matter. I just told you I don't have anyone blocked. Are you dense?
And you seriously think it's about you? Lmao.
You also need to Google the definition of triggered. Because you're ignorant to it.
Still can't answer the simplest of questions, must deflect! Lol.
I do what I want.Enter the thread to discuss the topic at hand instead of just me and I'll answer all questions. I don't run. But people don't like that either and I get fanbois. Lol.
See. You. Next. Time. Fanboi.
You absolutely do what you want .... with lack of control that I can predict like the sunrise. Predicted it last time, predicting it this time. See you next thread I comment in where you won't deal with the topic and just me because I trigger you. But if it helps your trauma process, I'm all for it.I do what I want.
Lol, you don't run. Omg, that's awesome.
The fanboi slayer!
Bahahahaha!You absolutely do what you want .... with lack of control that I can predict like the sunrise. Predicted it last time, predicting it this time. See you next thread I comment in where you won't deal with the topic and just me because I trigger you. But if it helps your trauma process, I'm all for it.
was it ever proven he said those words?I think our reactions and that of NFLN were justified with his history. And I maintain if he did make the alleged sexual innuendos revealed in her testimony it was worthy of reporting to Marriott HR .
Anyone with or without his reputation asking a female employee at a hotel at 2 am in the morning after drinking if she has ever felt a man of his ethnicity inside her would draw an investigation at your workplace.
None of us have a clue and likely never will. A settlement usually entails both parties keeping their mouths shut. If either party discusses the details of the settlement, they would likely be in violation of the agreement and could suffer monetarily. This is why settlements happen. The NFL would love to settle with Gruden, but Gruden wants the info out to embarrass those that caused the end of his career.was it ever proven he said those words?
I doubt it, otherwise, no settlement, and he'd be off the air forever.
Right. If Irvin had been proven to say those words, he wouldn't be getting a check from Mariott to drop the $100 million suit and stay quiet.None of us have a clue and likely never will. A settlement usually entails both parties keeping their mouths shut. If either party discusses the details of the settlement, they would likely be in violation of the agreement and could suffer monetarily. This is why settlements happen. The NFL would love to settle with Gruden, but Gruden wants the info out to embarrass those that caused the end of his career.
So he was innocent, I remember certain posters already putting the blame on him
That's what I asked (post #222).Congratulations Playmaker. So no more Skip?
She was part of the lawsuit. Jane Doe to protect her identity.The little gold digging tramp that lie on him should be sued for everything she owns and put out on the street.
The people who work for the hotel and lied on him should be sued for everything they own and put out on the street.
If you want to stop this irresponsible behavior and lying, you have to start either handing out extensive jail time or taking away ALL of their possessions.
Watch how fast that whole gold digging extortion thing disappears if this is the repercussions of being found guilty trying to extort someone leads to this type of punishment.
He was working with ESPN before and it wasn't an issue.That's what I asked (post #222).
No conflict of interest if Irvin has a gig with both FOX and NFLN?