Déjà vu all over again.Feels like I’ve been reading an article like this every year. THIS year we will focus on the run game more and have a better offense.
I understand your hesitancy to buy into it but it is a new coaching staff and lots of the staff they brought in and some of the players they've been picking up so far with the draft ahead says that this probably is an actual legitimate statement.. And really they've only truly had two years I can remember that they've not addressed the run game the way they did last year and that was last year and in 2015 they both tried running back by committee both had a terrible year because the quarterback got injured there were injuries all over the team and it made it look they weren't addressing it but towards the end of the year they did finally lean on the run game the offense looked better I hope they're just there's gonna be an extension to that and that's gonna be the norm going forward..Feels like I’ve been reading an article like this every year. THIS year we will focus on the run game more and have a better offense.
Why do you need to say Fat Mike? It make your entire post irrelevant to me.I remember Fat Mike saying we were gonna be good running because we were going to do it a lot.
Take a shot with Schotty!! Gag.
Yes, but the thing is Quinn, he wanted to use S's as LB's. That did not work, and he insisted on it.I agree about Quinn but Moore had to go... His offense was too vanilla and too easy to predict.
Yeah, but this time they mean it.Feels like I’ve been reading an article like this every year. THIS year we will focus on the run game more and have a better offense.
I think running the ball successfully can effect a team more than any other aspect.
1) Keep their defense on the field and tired
2) Keep our defense off the field and fresh
3) Clock control and management.
4) Dictate the pace of the game...faster/slower
5) Not as hard on the o-line (extended pass protection tires them out?)
And yes...of course they still need deep threats and a defense that CAN shut it down. Of course all aspects need to be strong as it all works and spins together... but an effective run game does so much.
I can pinpoint the time I stopped paying attention to Mickey. It was Thanksgiving during the Campo era. The Cowboys had just lost to the Broncos after falling behind by 16 in the fourth quarter. Yet, they actually managed to score two touchdowns in the final minutes. The canker? They kicked the extra point both times rather than going for two and ended up losing by two.Lost me in the first fourteen words.
I'm not entirely sure I want "run first". What I want is the right personnel, the right calls and the right time and a commitment to it. No more 3 passes on 5 and goal.I agree with what you say. My only thing is. The cowboys had one of the best running games in the league during zekes prime and in 2014.
But we never had the complete team around it.
So while I’m ok with building a run first team. It just doesn’t mean much to me until I see the other pieces put in place also.
we have been building for 30 years. the fandom is sick of waiting.Did you see what Barkley did with the Giants' OL? Top RB FA costs 15M, Top OL FA 35M..Where's the value???? The trouble with idiot Cowboys fans is that they want to win next year. You have to build a foundation first and that starts with the trenches. Build for 2027...
I agree with what you say. My only thing is. The cowboys had one of the best running games in the league during zekes prime and in 2014.
But we never had the complete team around it.
So while I’m ok with building a run first team. It just doesn’t mean much to me until I see the other pieces put in place also.
Barkley would argue that point.Jeanty doesn't need a great line in front of him. That's the beauty of him. But he's the only RB I'd draft in rd 1 because of that. To me, the drop off from him to the next group is significant. He's generational on film. The question might be the competition level he faced. That part scares me a bit. We need to draft 2 backs. One bruiser like Mafah or Mullings, then a take it to the house guy. In the meantime, we must solidify the Oline or it won't matter much.
You have to replace your reply with "should", not "will". We are talking the Jones' hereThat's why they will draft a top back and they very well could draft 2 backs.
Fortunately, I don't care what you think about my posts. Also because he's fat.Why do you need to say Fat Mike? It make your entire post irrelevant to me.